Answer:
- f(A1) = 0.575
- f(A2) = 0.425
Explanation:
Due to technical problems, you will find the complete explanation in the attached files
No a gene can code for anything
Hope this helps :)
Answer: Here is your anwser i hope this helps you alot thx for your time :)
Explanation: Honestly speaking, “risk behavior” can be categorized as any potentially detrimental action that is, or isn’t, precipitated by a conscious awareness of the mental, physical, emotional, spiritual and/or financial stakes that are being risked (or gambled) for the sake of achieving a goal of some sort.
In order for most teenagers to have an inclination that risk behavior should be investigated, or that it’s something they should be knowledgeable about, they must first be made aware of its existence. (Hence, the value, influential power and proven effectiveness found in quality parenting, mentorship and trial and error experiences.)
It’s vital that young people in general be “formally” introduced to the concept of risk behavior due to the fact what’s considered as risk is often based on a subjective assessment. Many subjective assessments tend to be bias; while favoring the preferences of the considering party at a given point. (Ex: Some humans tend to override their logic and awareness of impending risk if the goal they look to achieve strong-holds their desire.)
With regard to teenagers, the “task” of investigating and being knowledgeable can be viewed as counterintuitive because it requires objectivity, a filtering of desire and ultimately consideration of how they view life. Risk has proven to be associated with reward; but it’s also been strongly linked to loss. Its been linked to both equally; making any risk taken a gamble in theory.
The teenage mind is often thought to be in a crucial stage of development that will ultimately shape their quality of adult life to varying degrees. Teens investigating and being knowledgeable about risk behavior is best considered as preventative steps to ensure one’s ability to navigate latter years of life isn’t based on impulse and an inability to understand the depth of impact related to decision-making.
Hopefully this helps.
The DNA in the nucleus and mitochondria are the same.
This is not exactly true, although they are similar. This is not a correct option.
The following three are correct options:
Mitochondria and chloroplasts grow independently from the cell.
This is true, and supports the idea that they previously existed as their own organisms.
Prokaryotic cells, mitochondria, and chloroplasts are all the same size.
All three organisms/organelles are roughly the same size, which supports the idea that chloroplasts and mitochondria are descendants or prokaryotes.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts contain their own ribosomes.This is true as well.
