Answer:
true
Explanation:
yes, naturally occurring files can share harsh values.
Answer:
First make sure everyone is allright and assist in any way you can.
Even though the American adversarial process was modelled on the medieval way of solving disputes physically but the value in the process is that a trial proceeds with two parties using skills to oppose each other through argument.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Adversarial is a form of legal system where the parties to the case or put forth their arguments and tender their evidence either by bringing on record the document or examining the witnesses or by both in accordance with the law before the impartial and independent judge.
The case of each parted is presented by their respective attorneys. This system is essentially modelled on the medieval way of solving disputes by physical fights as the parties are essentially having the competing claims and are fight against each other but this fight is not the physical fight rather based on the arguments and conviction.
Answer:
CPC Inc. will probably lose the suit.
Explanation:
The Robinson-Patman Act contains the regulations that govern price discrimination. The purpose of this Act is to prevent unfair competition. The Act sets forth that a business must sell its products at the same price regardless of who the purchaser is. However, in the question at issue, there is a not-for-profit hospital involved, which is the buyer of the drugs. In this case, PharMax may resort to the Non-Profit Institutions Act (NPIA), which is the exemption to the Robinson–Patman Act referred to above, and claim that according to the NPIA, pharmaceutical manufacturers are entitled to sell hospitals, libraries and universities (non-profit institutions), discounted products. As a consequence, the hospital shall receive the drugs at a lower price than that charged to other retail pharmacy.
To sum up, there is no violation of the price discrimination laws and CPC Inc. will lose the lawsuit.
