Answer:
32.1% ( depending on question might have to round to 32% )
Step-by-step explanation:
60*52=3210
3210/100= 32.1
Answer: 8.954 x 10^-15
Step-by-step explanation:
i took a test with this question and this was the answer
Answer:
p = 0.07
p-hat = 0.035
p0 = 0.07
p-value = 0.003
Step-by-step explanation:
p = population parameter, in this case, the rate of infestations across all trees in the forest
p-hat = test statistic, in this case, the rate of infestations found in the sample of trees, i.e. those in Doug's backyard
p0 = the null hypothesis, in this case, the rate of infestations within the forest is correctly evaluated at 0.07 or 7%
p-value = the likelihood any difference between p and p-hat is down to chance
In this case 0.003 as the p-value means there is only 0.3% probability of our statistic value of 0.035 being down to variability and chance meaning it is 99.7% likely that there is some reason behind this difference;
We would accept the alternative hypothesis which says the current parameter value, 0.07, is in fact incorrect (either too high or too low, in this case, likely too high).
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : The formula 
We have to rearrange the given formula for 
Consider the given formula
Multiply both side by 2, we have,
Divide both side by 
, we have,
Simplify, we get,
Thus,
Answer:
B. 21x + 40 ≤ 124
Step-by-step Explanation:
Maximum amount budgeted = $124 (this means they can't spend more than this)
x = number of people
Cost per head = $21
Given that Mr Walter already spent $40, which is part of the money budgeted, the number of people that can go canoeing cam be expressed with the following inequality:
21x + 40 ≤ 124
(note: the amount total to be spent will either be equal to or greater than $124, because it's the maximum amount budgeted for spending).
