The economic development of the mid-atlantic, new england, and southern colonies differed mainly because of climate (the north colonies were much more cold than the southern, which limited the amount and the types of plants they can grow), soil (northern soil was not as fertile as southern), resources found (there were greater amounts of fishes in the north then south, and so the Northern colonists built up a "fish economy" instead of farming.)
hope this helps
Have skid s accusing w about w sound Ed
Answer:
-But when spring came, rich and warm, we raised our sights again.
-Success lay at the end of summer like a pot of gold, and our campaign got off to a good start.
-Promise hung about us like the leaves, and wherever we looked, ferns unfurled and birds broke into song.
Explanation:
Answer:
1 - As technology is at the forefront of the effects of reform and renaissance, especially the increase in productive power and the valuation of raw materials arising from mechanization, research and development of tools to support people's transportation, production and production has become the first priority.
2 - Different cultural interactions have changed or remained the same due to the cultural activities seen by people who are brought to the colonial countries in order to contribute to production or to control the rate of production in the colonized country and the cultural interaction of people brought from colonial countries in the colonial country.
3 - Entertainment and culture, especially with the importance of machinery, cars, motorcycles and cuckoo clocks are the best examples. Amusement parks, toy trains and some small robotic toys made of tin but powered by gasoline were made for entertainment.
Explanation:
According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state <u>can not interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
The case of Gibbons and the Ogden was presented in the Supreme Court in the United States of America. It was in the year 1824 and was one of the most important cases of that time.
According to this case, a principle was established and it established a legislative enactment. According to this, a state could not interfere in the power of the congress and the power that was talked about in this principle was about interfering with the regulation of the commerce. It was only in the hand of the congress and not with the states.
