1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnyKZ [126]
3 years ago
12

According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state

History
1 answer:
puteri [66]3 years ago
3 0

According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state <u>can not interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce.</u>

<u>Explanation</u>:

The case of Gibbons and the Ogden was presented in the Supreme Court in the United States of America. It was in the year 1824 and was one of the most important cases of that time.

According to this case, a principle was established and it established a legislative enactment. According to this, a state could not interfere in the power of the congress and the power that was talked about in this principle was about interfering with the regulation of the commerce. It was only in the hand of the congress and not with the states.

You might be interested in
How did the Mughal emperors show their power
marysya [2.9K]
Akbar the Mughal emperor of India approached religion during his rule with tolerance
5 0
3 years ago
Once Congress declares war and the President assumes the role of Commander-in-Chief who decides how the war ends?​
Inessa [10]

Answer:

Both? here let me explain...

Explanation:

If you want to get technical, once the President assumes the Role of Commander in Chief of the United States Military he has control over all military action while congress; per the original intent of the constitution, has control over starting war and ending it. If you really had to choose one or the other the Commander in Chief has in most occurrences decided how war ends. I really hope this helped, if not my apologies and if you need any more elaboration please let me know down in the comments and I will do my best.

 

8 0
2 years ago
Pride in one’s (blank) contributes to feelings of nationalism.
irakobra [83]
Nationalism is taking pride in one's own nation. So put country in the blank my friend.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did New Jersey and Delaware have in common?
In-s [12.5K]

Explanation:

Both came from territory that was originally part of the Jersey colony. Both colonies were given in payment for debts.

7 0
2 years ago
Why was Shays's Rebellion important?
choli [55]

Answer:

I meant D

Explanation:

Shay's rebellion showed that the Articles of Confederation was only used in order to put down future uprisings and for the strengthening of the federal government.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • More than half of turkeys population lives on coastal plains because
    6·1 answer
  • Grafton Morgan is a slave from Virginia. His family is spread out over several owners.
    10·1 answer
  • What is the difference between foreign policy and domestic policy? *
    10·1 answer
  • What challenges did the British Army have​
    5·1 answer
  • What part so state governments play in the amendment process outlined in the us constitution​
    11·1 answer
  • What is the hook in an argumentative essay?
    15·2 answers
  • Realiza un comentario sobre el texto leido:
    5·1 answer
  • What is the name of Japan’s northern island?
    12·2 answers
  • How did Plessy vs. Ferguson affect race relations in the south?*
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me? :(
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!