Answer:
One day a woman was roaming the streets when she saw the latest expensive shoes in the glass window of a shop. she entered looking all battered with dirty clothes. two employees awaited and one of them looked at her in disgust. the other worker seemed welcoming and whispered to the other employee not to JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER. when another customer walked in looking beautiful the rude employee attended to her at once and nudged her to buy the shoes. the woman said that she had no money and was just looking for a replacement for her own torn shoes. the dirty woman turned to buy the shoes. ALL THAT GLITTERS IS NOT GOLD and APEARANCES CAN BE DECEPTIVE
The correct answer is C. Although Peterson's comments may have been valid at one time, his book is over 30 years old.
This sentence is challenging the credibility of Peterson's book because it is old. At one point, his arguments may have been correct, but this has certainly changed over time given that over 30 years have passed since he published his book. Now, there are newer opinions about the topic, so he isn't a credible source anymore.
no, as first person is being told by one character. it can not go back and forth between time like third person, unless the narrator, who's perspective we are seeing, takes us into a flash back or has powers which allows them to see the future.
Answer: Brainly wasn’t letting me upload it, so I just took a screenshot. Other than that, you did a great job!!!!
B, after reading i’m pretty sure
