1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lerok [7]
3 years ago
5

What does a Constitution explain?

History
1 answer:
marta [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The vast majority of contemporary constitutions describe the basic principles of the state, the structures and processes of government and the fundamental rights of citizens in a higher law that cannot be unilaterally changed by an ordinary legislative act. This higher law is usually referred to as a constitution.

Explanation:

mark brainliest PLEASE

You might be interested in
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
Savatey [412]

Answer: it is PARABLE

Explanation: even though you didn’t provide a list but this is the right answer.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement summarizes one result of the u.s. involvement in the Vietnam War
GREYUIT [131]
We dropped napalm on people in vietnam cuz we were scared( sarcastic)
we lost many mig planes and people were lost every day in battle
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As the American population grew between 1820 and 1850 the percentage of Americans living on farms also grew true or false
Mashcka [7]
I’m pretty sure this is true, because a lot of people lost their jobs in that time, he had to resort to living on a farm.

Hope this helps! :33
3 0
3 years ago
Word Bank
sergij07 [2.7K]
Egypt i did this before and this the answers
7 0
2 years ago
What was president carters response to the soviet unions invasion of Afghanistan in 1979
Aliun [14]
I come to you this evening to discuss the extremely important and rapidly changing circumstances in Southwest Asia. . . .

. . . Massive Soviet military forces have invaded the small, nonaligned, sovereign nation of Afghanistan, which had hitherto not been an occupied satellite of the Soviet Union.

Fifty thousand heavily armed Soviet troops have crossed the border and are now dispersed throughout Afghanistan, attempting to conquer the fiercely independent Muslim people of that country.

The Soviets claim, falsely, that they were invited into Afghanistan to help protect that country from some unnamed outside threat. But the President, who had been the leader of Afghanistan before the Soviet invasion, was assassinated – along with several members of his family – after the Soviets gained control of the capital city of Kabul. Only several days later was the new puppet leader even brought into Afghanistan by the Soviets.

This invasion is an extremely serious threat to peace because of the threat of further Soviet expansion into neighboring countries in Southwest Asia and also because such an aggressive military policy is unsettling to other peoples throughout the world.

This is a callous violation of international law and the United Nations Charter. It is a deliberate effort of a powerful atheistic government to subjugate an independent Islamic people.

We must recognize the strategic importance of Afghanistan to stability and peace. A Soviet-occupied Afghanistan threatens both Iran and Pakistan and is a steppingstone to possible control over much of the world’s oil supplies.

The United States wants all nations in the region to be free and to be independent. If the Soviets are encouraged in this invasion by eventual success, and if they maintain their dominance over Afghanistan and then extend their control to adjacent countries, the stable, strategic, and peaceful balance of the entire world will be changed. This would threaten the security of all nations including, of course, the United States, our allies, and our friends.

Therefore, the world simply cannot stand by and permit the Soviet Union to commit this act with impunity. Fifty nations have petitioned the United Nations Security Council to condemn the Soviet Union and to demand the immediate withdrawal of all Soviet troops from Afghanistan.

. . . [N]either the United States nor any other nation which is committed to world peace and stability can continue to do business as usual with the Soviet Union.

I have already recalled the United States Ambassador from Moscow back to Washington. He’s working with me and with my other senior advisers in an immediate and comprehensive evaluation of the whole range of our relations with the Soviet Union.

The successful negotiation of the SALT II treaty1 has been a major goal and a major achievement of this administration, and we Americans, the people of the Soviet Union, and indeed the entire world will benefit from the successful control of strategic nuclear weapons through the implementation of this carefully negotiated treaty.

However, because of the Soviet aggression, I have asked the United States Senate to defer further consideration of the SALT II treaty so that the Congress and I can assess Soviet actions and intentions and devote our primary attention to the legislative and other measures required to respond to this crisis. As circumstances change in the future, we will, of course, keep the ratification of SALT II under active review in consultation with the leaders of the Senate.

The Soviets must understand our deep concern. We will delay opening of any new American or Soviet consular facilities, and most of the cultural and economic exchanges currently under consideration will be deferred. Trade with the Soviet Union will be severely restricted. . . .

Along with other countries, we will provide military equipment, food, and other assistance to help Pakistan defend its independence and its national security against the seriously increased threat it now faces from the north. The United States also stands ready to help other nations in the region in similar ways.

Neither our allies nor our potential adversaries should have the slightest doubt about our willingness, our determination, and our capacity to take the measures I have outlined tonight. I have consulted with leaders of the Congress, and I am confident they will support legislation that may be required to carry out these measures.

History teaches, perhaps, very few clear lessons. But surely one such lesson learned by the world at great cost is that aggression, unopposed, becomes a contagious disease. . . .
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Louisiana become a Spanish possession?
    12·2 answers
  • Three abnormal physical responses to stress are sweating, chills, and increased nervous energy.
    12·1 answer
  • President nixon issued wage-price controls in an effort to stabilize the economy. this use of executive power was
    11·1 answer
  • How do cuneiform relate to mesopotamian
    9·1 answer
  • Which pair is f statement best compares the rights and requirements of us citizen
    13·2 answers
  • According to Karl Marx what social relations matter most in capitalist system
    14·1 answer
  • Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehe<br> he
    10·2 answers
  • which issue created a major conflict between state and federal governments one that we switched to resolve by a powerful and ass
    10·1 answer
  • . What is the difference between formal and implied powers within the Executive Branch? Give examples for each.
    11·2 answers
  • Which two countries did not ally with each other prior to world war i?.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!