Answer:
$72,700
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Purchasing cost = $70,000
Sales tax = $700
Freight charges = $800
Shipping charges = $150
Repair charges = $1,300
Installation cost = $1,050
Now,
Cost of the equipment
= Purchasing cost + Sales tax + Freight charges + Shipping charges + Installation cost
= $70,000 + $700 + $800 + $150 + $1,050
= $72,700
Note: Repair cost is not included in the cost.
Explanation:
Companies could improve and implement differentiated services for customers.
What could probably happen is that tour companies offer a personalized service, faster and cheaper with the possibility of purchasing a skycar and jet, as hotel guests usually make a tour itinerary that requires high mobility costs, therefore offering this differentiated and cheaper service directly at the establishment would mean a focused differentiation strategy that would add several benefits, such as increased profitability and customer loyalty.
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
I think it would be better if you provided some options to choose. But I think, I know the answer. I think it's one of practice innovative strategies.
