Answer:
6/5 or 1.2, they're the same value
Step-by-step explanation:
When it says "rate of change", it's really just asking for the slope. If you don't know what the slope is, essentially how much the y-value increases by whenever x increases by 1. This can be formally defined using the equation:
which is essentially
. The subtraction is finding the difference between the two numbers to see how much it's changed by. Btw the order doesn't matter, I could plug in (-3, -2) as (x2, y2) or I could plug it in as (x1, y1) as long as I make sure to input it in correctly. In this example I'll just say (-3, -2) = (x1, y1) and (2, 4) = (x2, y2). Plugging these values into the equation gives you:
that's the rate of change
Answer:
The minimum sample size needed is 125.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of
, and a confidence level of
, we have the following confidence interval of proportions.

In which
z is the zscore that has a pvalue of
.
The margin of error is:

For this problem, we have that:

99% confidence level
So
, z is the value of Z that has a pvalue of
, so
.
What minimum sample size would be necessary in order ensure a margin of error of 10 percentage points (or less) if they use the prior estimate that 25 percent of the pick-axes are in need of repair?
This minimum sample size is n.
n is found when 
So






Rounding up
The minimum sample size needed is 125.
The amount of light passing through each foot the water in the lake = 100% - 60% = 40%
The percent of light passing through 5 feet of water = 0.4^5 = 0.01024 = 1.02%
Answer:
y = -7/3x + 10
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Find the slope of the perpendicular line
Do this by taking the negative inverse of the first line
m = -7/3
Step 2: Find <em>b</em>
y = mx + b
y = -7/3x + b
3 = -7/3(3) + b
3 = -7 + b
b = 10
You should get y = -7/3x + 10 as your final answer.
Lets say that the two unknown integers are

and

.
We know the following things about

and

:


And, we want to find

.
To solve this, we'll use the expansion of the squared of the sum of any two inegers; this is expressed as:

So, given what we know about the unknown integers, the previous can be written as:

We can easily solve for

:
The answer is 168.
Another approach to solve the problem is, from the two starting equations, compute the values of

and

, which are 12 and 14, and directly compute their product; however, the approach described is more elegant.