Answer:
The reformers for the elimination of the patronage wanted civil service jobs to be filled by putting people who were truly qualified to fill the positions. The positions were filled through nepotism which was bad and they wanted a change.
They believed the positions should be based on merit and best hands should be given the posts. They didn’t want it to about any political affiliation or recommendation.
B. People should avoid conflict whenever possible
Laozi’s main concern involved describing a way of life that could be true to the natural order of God’s laws. He advocated for simplicity and a way of life that avoids conflict whenever posssible
This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced.
Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied.
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld.
Answer:
Explanation:
The number of electrons in a neutral atom is equal to the number of protons. The mass number of the atom (M) is equal to the sum of the number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. The number of neutrons is equal to the difference between the mass number of the atom (M) and the atomic number (Z).
