-Spain- gold, silver, new goods (Columbian exchange), intense catholic missionaries, didn't heavily colonize (Gold, God, Glory); conquistadors
Pizarro- silver mines at Potosi became spain's wealth for next 100 years
Cortes
just wanted to maintain empire bc after 1588 spanish armada, fell into decline
-Britain wanted to expand royal government in colonies, not as focused on bullionism or conversion. Jamestown, joint stock company
North and South Carolina: charter by king charles
<span>France- expand the fur trade, native population, catholic missionaries. </span>
Cartier in canada
Marquette in MS river
Champlain had friendly relations w natives
<span>Courier dubois live among indians- have better relations w/ indians </span>
<span>1.) Why is the study of genocide important, and how can it be intellectually enlightening?
2.) </span><span>How could such powerful nations stand by as these slaughters were being committed?</span>
Answer:
This can be argued either way but I say: Yes.
Explanation:
With the taxes and with the way the British was handling the colonies, they were better off forming their own government and keeping trade open with the motherland.
The people of the colonies knew what was best for their people.
Answer:
The Minoan and Mycenaean civilizations were maritime or sea-going and trading economies. The Mesopotamian civilizations were primarily land locked and dependent upon agricultural economies along with land based trade routes.
The six extermination camps were Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka, Majdanek and Auschwitz-Birkenau. Auschwitz and Majdanek death camps also used extreme work under starvation conditions in order to kill their prisoners.
