The question is asking to state one of the biggest criticisms of the USA Patriot act and base on my research and further investigation, I would say that one of the biggest criticism of the USA patriot act would be that It weakens the protection of civil liberties. I hope you are satisfied with my answer
The debt accumulated from when America had borrowed a mass of money both after and during the American Revolution. This later contributed to the French Revolution.
The answer is B. It was based off the moral principles.
The British dissolved the Massachusetts legislature Boston Harbor was blockaded and closed was NOT a provision of the Intolerable (Coercive) Acts.
The Coercive Acts were implemented in an effort to overthrow Massachusetts Bay and to warn the other colonies of the repercussions of disobedient behaviour. Each legislation was created with the intent of seriously impairing a certain facet of colonial life. The Boston Port Bill's attack on colonial trade hurt the local economy, increased unemployment, and resulted in Boston's residents becoming hungry. The Justice Act eliminated the right to a fair trial, while the Government Act destroyed democratic government by installing an all-powerful governor.
So, The correct answer is the last one.
To know more about the Coercive Acts:
brainly.com/question/10362829
#SPJ9
Explanation:
The United States Civil Rights Act of 1964, named in English Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Congressional Law 88-352, 78 United States Statutes at Large 241, enacted on July 2, 1964) is a historic civil and labor law for that country, which was a key piece to prohibit racial discrimination and racial segregation. The Law established a series of mandatory rules for voter registration in the states of the Union, in order to guarantee the right to vote of all citizens and avoid the arbitrariness that in some southern states were used to prevent the vote of The African American population. It also established mandatory rules throughout the country, so that no owner of public access establishments or services (parks, theaters, restaurants, public transport, stadiums, hotels, etc.) could discriminate against people or segregate them on the grounds of "race, color, religion or national origin ", considering that such actions constituted a criminal offense. In education, the law established a procedure to" desegregate "public education and ensure that ethnic differences do not affect equal educational opportunities.1 In labor matters, the law established that it would be considered "illegal employment", any hiring, dismissal or treatment in employment, which implies a discrimination based on "race, color, religion, sex, or national origin" (years later it would be added age over 40 years), establishing a summary procedure to punish the offense and restore the affected worker in the position of work from which he was excluded. Finally, the law created the Commission for Equal Employment Opportunities (EEOC).
