They were given a pardon.
As a candidate, Carter himself had said he advocated "pardon" -- a term he preferred over "amnesty." He said, "Amnesty means that what you did was right. Pardon means that
what you did, whether it's right or wrong, you are forgiven
for it. And I do advocate a pardon for draft evaders. ... Now is the time to heal our country after the Vietnam war. ... I hope to bring about an end to the divisiveness that has occurred in our country as a result of the Vietnam war."
On his second day in office, President Carter in fact did pardon draft dodgers. This applied only to civilians who evaded the draft. It did not apply to active duty military personnel who went absent without leave (AWOL) or deserted their units during the war.
It’s a city state.
Explanation
I would say a. sioux indian attacks on stagecoach lines.
Answer:
a) In source one, the political revolution in American and French revolutions led to barring of old traditions of royal charisma and made ploitical authorities accountable. On the other hand, source 2 says that Fench revolution and revolution in America have thought to mark emergence of citizenship but in theiri times their lessons were inconclusive. The lessons and change were realized gradually.
b) American and French revolutions removed the weight of tradition and troyal charisma and held political authorities accountable to a community of citizens
c) Within empires spaces outside Europe it was unclear whether the idea of individual rights was a necessary revolution or restricted to a certain area of the world.
Explanation:
a) Refer to following lines from source 1: " the American and French revolutionaries expanded the whole horizon of the age, opening a path of linear progress, grounding social relations for the first time on the principle of formal equality, lifting the weight of tradition and royal charisma, and instituting a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens"
Refer to following lines from source 2: " The French revolution and those in North and South America have been transformed into founding myths in their respective countries and are thought to mark the emergence of citizenship, of national economies, of the very idea of the nation. But in their own time, the revolutions’ lessons were inconclusive
b) Refer to the following: "lifting the weight of tradition and royal charisma, and instituting a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens"
c) Refer to the following: "and within empires’ spaces overseas it was unclear whether the idea of [individual rights] would be a contagious proposition or one [restricted to] a select few. ."
Answer:
Nkrumah said that the the most significant happening of the twentieth century is the people who had been exploited and suppressed for long, are finally standing up for their rights against the powers that have kept them in subjection.
Explanation:
Solution
According to Nkrumah, who was the leader in the fight for Ghana's independence, he said that the most significant happening of the twentieth century is the exploited and suppressed people who are finally standing up against the powers that have kept them in oppression.
He was Opposed to colonialism because, he felt like the foreign power is just taking territories for its own economic benefit.
