The following would be the development of an argument that assesses how the Columbian Exchange influenced people in the Americas during this era of 1450-1750: As a result of the advent of illnesses like chicken pox, many Native Americans perished.
We are required to formulate a defense for the claim that the Columbian Exchange had a significant impact on people in the Americas between 1450 and 1750 in accordance with the question that has been provided.
This enables us to understand that the discovery of Native American territories during Christopher Columbus' voyage sparked a frenzied dash toward the location since it was believed to contain gold and other valuables.
The Native Americans died in great numbers as a result of new illnesses brought by the European settlers that had not yet been discovered by them.
To know more about Columbian Exchange here
brainly.com/question/16038564
#SPJ4
Sorry this description is a bit confusing but i couldn't really think of a way to phrase it properly :)
most economists believe that deregulation has the potential to be helpful because the fact that things aren't regulated by the government increases competition in people selling the same wares, which normally ends up lowering the price of that specific good and/or improving the quality of the good drastically (which means more people will be buying, it whatever it may be, which is good for the economy)
Answer:
Affective Stage
Explanation:
Affective stage is the most important stage for the market that helps in understanding the customer feeling that how much customer has been attached for a particular brand and from this the market always check that the customer requirement with some strong levels i.e. price, quantity, and quality, etc. for a particular product from which the customer has been attached since long.
Answer:
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
The imposition of tax creates a tax wedge. The price paid by buyers increases and price received by sellers decreases. This causes the equilibrium quantity of products to decrease.
Though, the change in quantity depends upon the elasticity of demand and supply. If both demands are inelastic and the increase in price will cause the quantity demanded to decrease less than proportionate.
If the supply is inelastic, a decrease in price will cause less than a proportionate decline in quantity supplied.
So when both the supply as well as demand is inelastic, the tax revenue will be the most.
Answer:
Intrinsic Value = $38.0025
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}Year&Dividends&Present \: Value\\0&1&-\\1&1.2&1.0984\\2&1.44&1.2065\\3&1.728&1.3252\\4&2.0736&1.4556\\5&51.2301&32.9168\\Intrinsic&Value&38.0025\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7DYear%26Dividends%26Present%20%5C%3A%20Value%5C%5C0%261%26-%5C%5C1%261.2%261.0984%5C%5C2%261.44%261.2065%5C%5C3%261.728%261.3252%5C%5C4%262.0736%261.4556%5C%5C5%2651.2301%2632.9168%5C%5CIntrinsic%26Value%2638.0025%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Fist, we calcualte the increase of the dividends, by multipling by (1+growth) 1.20 until year 4.
At year 5 we multiply by 1.05
Because from here the company will have a fixed growth rate, we can apply the dividend growth model
![\frac{divends}{return-growth} = Intrinsic \: Value](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bdivends%7D%7Breturn-growth%7D%20%3D%20Intrinsic%20%5C%3A%20Value)
1.52838/ (0.0925-0.05) = 51.2301
Next we have to bring all these dividends, which are placed in futures date, to present value:
![\frac{Principal}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7BPrincipal%7D%7B%281%20%2B%20rate%29%5E%7Btime%7D%20%7D%20%3D%20PV)
for example
![\frac{1.728}{(1 + 0.0925)^{3} } = PV](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1.728%7D%7B%281%20%2B%200.0925%29%5E%7B3%7D%20%7D%20%3D%20PV)
PV = 1.3252
<em />
<em>Lastly, we add all the PV to get the intrinsic value of the share today.</em>