Answer:
$19,100
Step-by-step explanation:
The expected profit would be the probability of profit multiplied by the profit and the sum of probability of loss multiiplied by the loss.
So, we can say:
E(p) = P(p)*P + P(L)*L
Where
E(p) is expected profit
P(p) is probabilty of profit (0.7)
P is the profit (35,000)
P(L) is probability of loss (0.3)
L is the loss (-18,000)
Substituting these values, we get:
E(p) = P(p)*P + P(L)*L
E(p) = (0.7)(35,000) + (0.3)(-18,000)
E(p) = 19,100
The expected profit is $19,100
Answer: 3/2
==========================================================
Explanation:
Pick any two points on the red line. I'll pick (0,1) and (2,4)
Those coordinates will be plugged into the slope formula below
m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
m = (4 - 1)/(2 - 0)
m = 3/2
This means we go up 3 and over to the right 2 when traveling along this red line.
Answer: D) III only
With figure I, we can't use HL (hypotenuse leg) theorem because we don't know if the two hypotenuses are the same length. We know that one pair of legs (the vertical legs) are congruent, but we don't have enough info
With figure II, we have two pairs of congruent legs. The tickmarks tell us this. However we don't know if the hypotenuses are congruent. Note: we can use the LL (leg leg) theorem, which is related to the HL theorem, but that's not what the teacher wants
Figure III is the only figure where we know that a pair of hypotenuses are the same length as shown by the similar tickmarks. The vertical legs are congruent as well for the upper pair of triangles. We have enough info to use HL.
I think it doesn’t move unless you push the same amount of force or more to make the stove more. wouldn’t The net force be 35 because 115-80=35
and They seem unbalanced. If anyone else sees think feel free to correct me.
