Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The getaway driver will most likely be forind guilty as they are both involved in the burglary theft just only for his partner to cart away additional stuff (cocaine) what chbwas not part of the initial agreement. However, one thing still remains, which is that the getaway driver and the cocaine thief acted together in other to perform an unlawful burglary. What the getaway driver is being charged for is being an accomplice which he actually his just not on the theft of cocaine. But that the only way he could be cleared of being an accomplice on cocaine theft is for the other thief to confess which will still lead them into another court case.
<u>This is false.</u>
Individuals know stealing isn't right, yet they do it as a result of psychological mechanisms, for example, motivated blindness.
"Motivated blindness" alludes to the human propensity to neglect data that neutralizes what individuals need to accept, either in light of the fact that the conviction is to their greatest advantage or just on the grounds that they have held the conviction quite a while and they are candidly put resources into holding it. The human personality is modified to specifically observe prove supporting the ends it might want to reach, while it has a tendency to overlook or rebate confirm that conflicts with its previous inclinations.
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
myths, legends, and folktales
Explanation:
they are mostly unknown
Answer:
One of the ways that the government can become a consumer is that in its construction projects, they are dependent on manufacturers of cement, gravels, and others. There are still lots and lots of examples of this. Then, a way that it becomes the producer is when it lets the citizens pay for all the permits. They produce the permits and actually earn money from it. They use this money for different projects.
Explanation:
