Answer:
The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain.
Explanation:
Kelo v. City of New London is a judgment of the US Supreme Court on whether the government can expropriating private property and transferring it to another private entity, with the purpose of economic development of the city. The plaintiff, Kelo, was the resident of the requisitioned land, and the defendant was the municipality of New London, Connecticut. On June 23, 2005, the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court on this case attracted wide attention. This case involved a “paid collection” of land. According to the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court, local municipalities have the power to impose private land for commercial development – as long as such development falls within the category of “public use”. The Supreme Court ruled that “the city’s planned deployment of land acquisition is in line with 'public use' and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment clause.” Therefore, the case also triggered a new round of discussions on how to implement the Fifth Amendment, how to explain it, and how to use it.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Each individual develops at their own pace. There is an individual's effort to find a balance between himself and his environment, adapt to the context and follow the rules imposed by the culture. There is a learning exercise influenced by the surroundings and customs, which permits the constructing of the logic.
Your answer is A. Qur' an but you can say Quran as well. I hope this helps! ^^ if you need any help at all with questions like these please ask and I'll gladly help. Hope you have a great rest of your day! :)
The correct answer is that communication is irreversible.
In the given situation, Amber is still hurt due to the things that John had said unto her, especially calling her a "slob". Though they already made up, Amber still feels upset, because she thinks that what John has said is true. John is experiencing the irreversible aspect of communication, wherein communication cannot be taken back, whatever you might have said, will stay that way. It cannot be changed nor taken back.
