Answer:
Yes is a solution
Step-by-step explanation:
3h = 2(h+2)-1
We replace h=3
3*3 = 2(3+2) - 1
Solve
9 = 2(5)-1
9 = 10 - 1
9 = 9
Is correct h= 3
when we manage to find the same value on both sides of equality it means that the value entered is a possible option
Let's call the distance from the beach to the playground x.
Let's call the distance from the stand to the parking lot z.
Let's call the base of the biggest triangle in the picture (from the parking lot to the left) y.
Recall the pythagorean theorem: the sum of the squares of the legs of a right triangle is equal to the square of the hypotenuse.
There are three right triangles we can work with.
Triangle with sides 48, x and z. Here z is the hypotenuse so we get the equation

Triangle with sides 27, x and y. Here y is the hypotenuse so we get

Triangle with sides z, y and (48+27). Here (48+27) is the hypotenuse so we get

. That is,

We have 3 equations and 3 unknowns (x, y and z). So let's take the last equation:

and replace

and

using expressions that contain an expression in terms of x from the first two equations we came up with.
That gives us:

which we solve for x as follows:

Now that we know x we can substitute 36 for x into the equation

and solve for z as follows:

This means that the distance from the beach to the parking lot is 36 m and the distance from the stand to the parking lot is 60 m.
Answer:
For this case we want to check if the true mean for the depth of groves cut into aluminium by a machine is equal to 1.7 (null hypothesis) and the alternative hypothesis would be the complement different from 1.7. And the best system of hypothesis are:
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis ![\mu \neq 1.7[/tx]And the best system of hypothesis are:3. This two-sided test: H0: μ = 1.7 mm H1: μ ≠ 1.7 mmStep-by-step explanation:For this case we want to check if the true mean for the depth of groves cut into aluminium by a machine is equal to 1.7 (null hypothesis) and the alternative hypothesis would be the complement different from 1.7. And the best system of hypothesis are:Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu =1.7](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmu%20%5Cneq%201.7%5B%2Ftx%5D%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EAnd%20the%20best%20system%20of%20hypothesis%20are%3A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3E3.%20This%20two-sided%20test%3A%0A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EH0%3A%20%CE%BC%20%3D%201.7%20mm%0A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EH1%3A%20%CE%BC%20%E2%89%A0%201.7%20mm%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EStep-by-step%20explanation%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EFor%20this%20case%20we%20want%20to%20check%20if%20the%20true%20mean%20for%20the%20depth%20of%20groves%20cut%20into%20aluminium%20by%20a%20machine%20is%20equal%20to%201.7%20%28null%20hypothesis%29%20and%20the%20alternative%20hypothesis%20would%20be%20the%20complement%20different%20from%201.7.%20And%20the%20best%20system%20of%20hypothesis%20are%3A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3ENull%20hypothesis%3A%20%5Btex%5D%5Cmu%20%3D1.7)
Alternative hypothesis [tex]\mu \neq 1.7[/tx]
And the best system of hypothesis are:
3. This two-sided test:
H0: μ = 1.7 mm
H1: μ ≠ 1.7 mm
Answer:360
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: x=3
Step-by-step explanation:
16 = 7 + 3x
9 = 3x
3 = x
:0