1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ne4ueva [31]
3 years ago
14

Which event best marks the end of the Reconstruction period in the South?

History
1 answer:
Andreyy893 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

The Compromise of 1877 was an informal agreement between southern Democrats and allies of the Republican Rutherford Hayes to settle the result of the 1876 presidential election and marked the end of the Reconstruction era

You might be interested in
HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS IN UR OWN WORDS!!!!!!!!!
ryzh [129]
The olmecs created long- distance trade routes which was used to trade items in which were needed. Due to this the olmec culture spread out to a wider community.The olmec culture also made statues looking like heads from stone here’s and example

5 0
2 years ago
What was the significance of the fall of Constantinople in 1453?
muminat
Mehmed surrounded Constantinople from land and Sea while by employing iCannon to maintain a constant barrage of the cities formidable walls. The fall of the city removed what was once a powerful defense for Christian Europe against Muslim invasion allowing for it uninterrupted Ottoman expansion into Eastern Europe.

Give me brainliest
8 0
2 years ago
Why did the British act alone during king Leopolds rule
Julli [10]

Answer:

Mark as brainliest

Explanation:

symbolic presence in international legal accounts of the 19th century, but for historians of the era its importance has often been doubted. This article seeks to re-interpret the place of the Berlin General Act in late 19th-century history, suggesting that the divergence of views has arisen largely as a consequence of an inattentiveness to the place of systemic logics in legal regimes of this kind.

Issue Section:

 Articles

INTRODUCTION

The Berlin West Africa Conference of 1884-1885 has assumed a canonical place in historical accounts of late 19th-century imperialism 1 and this is no less true of the accounts provided by legal scholars seeking to trace the colonial origins of contemporary international law. 2 The overt purpose of the Conference was to ‘manage’ the ongoing process of colonisation in Africa (the ‘Scramble’ as it was dubbed by a Times columnist) so as to avoid the outbreak of armed conflict between rival colonial powers. Its outcome was the conclusion of a General Act 3 ratified by all major colonial powers including the US. 4 Among other things, the General Act set out the conditions under which territory might be acquired on the coast of Africa; it internationalised two rivers (the Congo and the Niger); it orchestrated a new campaign to abolish the overland trade in slaves; and it declared as ‘neutral’ a vast swathe of Central Africa delimited as the ‘conventional basin of the Congo’. A side event was the recognition given to King Leopold’s fledgling Congo Free State that had somewhat mysteriously emerged out of the scientific and philanthropic activities of the Association internationale du Congo . 5

If for lawyers and historians the facts of the Conference are taken as a common starting point, this has not prevented widely divergent interpretations of its significance from emerging. On one side, one may find an array of international lawyers, from John Westlake 6 in the 19th century to Tony Anghie 7 in the 21 st century, affirming the importance of the Conference and its General Act for having created a legal and political framework for the subsequent partition of Africa. 8 For Anghie, Berlin ‘transformed Africa into a conceptual terra nullius ’, silencing native resistance through the subordination of their claims to sovereignty, and providing, in the process, an effective ideology of colonial rule. It was a conference, he argues, ‘which determined in important ways the future of the continent and which continues to have a profound influence on the politics of contemporary Africa’. 9

5 0
3 years ago
Which statements about Adolf Hitler's rise to power are true?
svetlana [45]
I took this today its a and c
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which major event occurred in the Third Punic War? ( 4 points) Roman gains Sicily as its first province Roman capture and defeat
Minchanka [31]
The Third Punic War was the last Punic war fought between Carthage and Rome, and ended with the "Roman capture and defeat of Carthage" along with other territorial gains for Rome.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did humanism impact Europeans’ thinking about government? Power was seen as evil. Revolutions were expected. Political debat
    10·2 answers
  • Why do some people prefer ratifying conventions, rather than state legislatures, for the ratification of amendments?
    15·1 answer
  • Who is the stuppitest person in the world
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes consumer spending trends during
    7·1 answer
  • What started sectionalism in the United States in 1816?
    14·1 answer
  • OK HELP FAST! I NEED HELP IF YOU HAVE EVER TAKEN THIS QUESTION HELPPPPPPP IT'S AN ESSAY. It's a 5th grade test.
    12·1 answer
  • 【The First Opium War,】also known as the Opium War or the Anglo-Chinese War, was a series of military engagements fought between
    11·1 answer
  • What is tribal sovereignty?​
    13·1 answer
  • Whoever answers correct can have brainliest but answer ASAP!
    7·2 answers
  • 20 POINTS FOR THE CORRECT ANSWERS
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!