1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Akimi4 [234]
3 years ago
7

2 points

History
1 answer:
MAXImum [283]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1st one I believe!! try that

You might be interested in
What did Herbert Hoover do to help Americans survive the Depression?
kicyunya [14]
<span>Herbert Hoover did surprisingly little to help Americans survive the Depression, since he did not believe in a great amount of government intervention in the economy. Instead, he relied on private companies and charities to provide relief. </span>
4 0
4 years ago
When was the foreign-born population in the us at its highest percentage
telo118 [61]

According to the last data provided by the Census Bureau, the foreign-born population in the United States was at its highest percentage in 2017, representing an increase of almost two percent in respect to the previous year. The foreign-born residents´population amounts to 44.5 million.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes a successful domestic policy for Richard Nixon? A. encouraging Americans to reduce their gasoli
horrorfan [7]

Answer: C : creating OSHA to help...

Explanation:

I think that’s right

7 0
3 years ago
Read the following selection from the section "Judge Calls Segregation 'An Evil' That Must Be Eliminated."
Kryger [21]
Many plaintiffs were punished and threatened for their involvement in cases to end segregation.
4 0
3 years ago
What is the iran-contra scandal
MrMuchimi

The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.


The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]


The plan was later complicated in late 1985, when Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council diverted a portion of the proceeds from the Iranian weapon sales to fund the Contras, a group of anti-Sandinista rebel fighters, in their struggle against the socialist government of Nicaragua.[4] While President Ronald Reagan was a vocal supporter of the Contra cause,[7] the evidence is disputed as to whether he personally authorized the diversion of funds to the Contras.[4][5][8] Handwritten notes taken by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger on 7 December 1985 indicate that Reagan was aware of potential hostage transfers with Iran, as well as the sale of Hawk and TOW missiles to "moderate elements" within that country.[9] Weinberger wrote that Reagan said "he could answer to charges of illegality but couldn't answer to the charge that 'big strong President Reagan passed up a chance to free the hostages.'"[9] After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages.[10] The investigation was impeded when large volumes of documents relating to the affair were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.[11] On 4 March 1987, Reagan made a further nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for the affair and stating that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages".[12]


The affair was investigated by the U.S. Congress and by the three-person, Reagan-appointed Tower Commission. Neither investigation found evidence that President Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs.[4][5][8] In the end, fourteen administration officials were indicted, including then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions resulted, some of which were vacated on appeal.[13] The rest of those indicted or convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the presidency of George H. W. Bush, who had been Vice President at the time of the affair.[14] The Iran–Contra affair and the ensuing deception to protect senior administration officials (including President Reagan) has been cast as an example of post-truth politics.[15]

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is NOT and example of an African influence in Middle and South Americas
    7·1 answer
  • Why were Americans surprised when president Johnson supported civil rights?
    13·1 answer
  • Help ! Need this question answered
    11·1 answer
  • Thanks to the efforts of a number of inventors, the industrial revolution began in England's textile industry. who invented the
    13·2 answers
  • What was the government's "termination policy regarding Native Americans?
    5·1 answer
  • What does manuscript mean
    12·1 answer
  • Though Japan's imperial system is thousands of years old, Japanese emperors had very little power during the 17th, 18th, and 19t
    15·1 answer
  • Why was France joining the war important (put in your own words)
    11·1 answer
  • Compare the Committees of<br> Correspondence to something in our<br> society today.
    9·1 answer
  • What social impact did the events shown in the illustration have on the United
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!