1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AVprozaik [17]
3 years ago
7

Suppose that a 5% increase in the minimum wage causes a 5% reduction in employment. How would this affect employers and how woul

d it affect workers? In your opinion, would this be a good policy?
Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
garik1379 [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Increasing the minimum wage would not be a good policy.

Explanation:

The increase in the minimum wage would result in a spike or increase in the cost of production. The employer has to reduce the number of employees. As a result, output more than likely will be affected.

In theory, increasing the minimum wage is not a good policy.

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements is true of e-waste in the United States?
miskamm [114]
B
E- Waste is basically polluting the planet
3 0
3 years ago
If there is no way to eliminate a hazard from the work environment, what should be done in accordance with the hierarchy of cont
Klio2033 [76]

Answer: if there is no way to eliminate a hazard from the work environment in accordance with the hierarchy of controls you should try your best to avoid being in contact with the hazard as much as possible an if not the best thing to do is change the work environment if possible

Explanation:

i say this because safety is most important in the work place if your workers are not safe and healthy then the work wont be done properly germs etc may also spread according to what the illness or lack of safety is .

4 0
4 years ago
Read Historical Perspectives on page 55. Which viewpoint do you agree with the most? Explain your choice.
Lilit [14]

Answer : One can think of their own and then give their view on this. But I personally get agreed on first viewpoint, as the general white male population was allowed to participate in politics, despite of his land ownership and education being the barrier in this.

5 0
3 years ago
What was the treaty of Paris 1763
pantera1 [17]
The Treaty of Paris, often called the Peace of Paris, or the Treaty of 1763, was signed on February 10, 1763, by the kingdoms of Great Britain, France and Spain, with Portugal in agreement. Together with the Treaty of Hubertusburg, it ended the French and Indian War or the Seven Years' War. The treaties marked the beginning of an extensive period of British dominance outside of Europe.
While the bulk of conquered territories were restored to their pre-war owners, the British made some substantial overseas gains at the expense of France and, to a lesser extent, Spain. Preferring to keep Guadaloupe, France gave up New France and all of its claims to the territory east of the Mississippi River to Britain. Spain ceded Florida to the British, but later received New Orleans and French Louisiana from France; Manila and Cuba were restored to Spain. France retained Saint Pierre and Miquelon and recovered Guadeloupe, Martinique, and Saint Lucia in exchange for Dominica, Grenada, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Tobago going to the British. In India, the French lost out to the British, receiving back its "factories" (trading posts), but agreeing to support the British client governments, as well as returning Sumatra and agreeing not to base troops in Bengal. The British garrison on the Mediterranean island of Minorca was returned to her control, having been captured by the French at the outbreak of hostilities in Europe.
Britain returned the slave station on the isle of Gorée to the French, but gained the Senegal River and its settlements. Britain agreed to demolish its fortifications in Honduras, but received permission from Spain to keep a logwood-cutting colony there. Britain confirmed in the treaty the rights of its new subjects to practice the Roman Catholic religion and received confirmation of the continuation of the British king's Hanoverian right as a Prince-elector of the Holy Roman Empire.
It is sometimes claimed that the British King George III renounced his claim to be King of France by the treaty. However, this a historical myth, and it is also falsely attributed to some of the treaties of the French Revolutionary Wars. Such a renunciation is nowhere in the text of the treaty, and, in fact, George III continued to be styled "King of France" and used the fleurs-de-lis as part of his arms until 1801, when Britain and Ireland united. It was dropped then because the claim was regarded as anachronistic.
5 0
4 years ago
True or False: Lack of sleep is one of the leading causes of traffic fatalities.
Goryan [66]
True is the correct answer
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • All MLA-style in-text citations must also appear in which of the following components in your research
    7·2 answers
  • Brake-fluid condition can be tested visually, using litmus-type test strips and by checking the A. temperature. B. pressure. C.
    8·2 answers
  • Ano ano ang mga tema ng heograpiya
    6·1 answer
  • What processes can lead to the formation of volcanic islands in ocean
    11·1 answer
  • What determines/forms the shape of a countries population pyramid?
    7·1 answer
  • In general, where do the majority of messages
    15·1 answer
  • Joe earns $52,000 per year, and his income tax rate is 15%. Sally earns $75,000 per year, and her tax rate is 25%. This income t
    15·1 answer
  • Only ppl who have taken/taking AP bio answer this please!
    7·1 answer
  • Acceptable websites to use include those that
    10·2 answers
  • Compare Mongol rule, and its decline, in Persia vs. China.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!