1- The correct answer is B.
The narrator could not believe what Miguel had said, so he run off to the park to investigate. When he arrived, he realized Miguel was correct: there were no traces of the carnival there: no holes where the spikes had been, no hay scattered about.
2- The correct answer is D.
The narrator's father was astonished because he believed that Miguel and the reporter were wrong. He could not understand how it could be possible for there to be no carnival in the area when he and everyone in town had been to one the night before.
Answer: Evaluating evidence allows you to have a more rational and logical outlook on problems and situations that you may encounter, rather than basing your decisions off of emotion or inaccurate sources. Having reliable evidence that you have thoroughly evaluated enables you to make better decisions and view things from an unbiased point of view.
Sorry. I'm not sure if this helps or not, but this is the best that I've got (╥﹏╥)
