All categories

3 years ago

If you are sure that you will be able to pay off the balance of your credit card bill in full each month, you should consider:

Business

2 answers:

UNO [17]3 years ago

7 0

The answer is D, I jus took the quiz so you can trust this answer

kicyunya [14]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Please and thank you

uysha [10]

1. Annual percentage rate

2. Secured card

3. Cash advance

4. Balance transfer

I hope this helps!

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Pharoah Industries collected $106,000 from customers in 2019. Of the amount collected, $24,200 was for services performed in 201

vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

A. $33,200

B. $35,000

Explanation:

A. Computation for 2018 cash-basis net income

2018 cash-basis net income = $106,000 - $73,800

2018 cash-basis net income= $33,200

Therefore 2018 cash-basis net income is $33,200

(b) Computation for 2018 accrual-basis net income

2018 accrual-basis net income = ($106,000 - $24,200 + $39,400) - ( $73,800 - $29,100 + $41,500))

2018 accrual-basis net income= $121,200 - $86,200

2018 accrual-basis net income= $35,000

Therefore 2018 accrual-basis net income is $35,000

3 0

3 years ago

Why do you think states have licensing requirements for certain occupations?

kupik [55]

Answer: to prevent improper use or causing an issue with the thing they have to get a license for

8 0

3 years ago

In general, reducing the number of periods (n) used to pay off credit card debt but keeping the present value (PV) and interest

NARA [144]

In general, reducing the number of periods (n) used to pay off credit card debt but keeping the present value (PV) and interest rate (i) the same will increase the monthly payment (P).

Debt results once a shopper of a MasterCard company purchases an item or service through the card system. The late payment penalty itself will increase the number of debt the buyer has.

6 0

3 years ago

At 7:50 pm the lights flashed red indicating that a train was approaching. David Harris walked past the yellow line telling peop

pashok25 [27]

Answer with Explanation:

The negligence act would be used here and for a plaintiff to prove to win the suit following four factors must have to be proved which are:

Duty of care
Breach
Cause
Harm

Part 1. Duty of Care

The railroad company owed a duty of care to every person rail station and the way they had exercised this duty of care was in the form of red light that David Harris saw, which means they exercised reasonable duty of care to avoid the misshapen. This means the duty of care that David Harris owes to himself was not crossing the yellow line.

Part 2. Breach

In fact David Harris was the one to avoid the red light signal and was out of the yellow line. So the breach of duty of care was of David Harris not of the railroad company.

Part 3. Cause

The cause of the breach of duty of care by David Harris was negligence because neither was the railroad signals were allowing him nor he was saving somebody else's life.

Part 4. Harm

Yes, the negligence of David Harris resulted in his death which is the most harm a person can suffer.

Conclusion:

As only harm was satisfactory not the other 3 factors were in the favor of plaintiff, so the widow's argument is incorrect and David Harris was negligent not the railroad company. Hence railroad company owes nothing in compensation to the David Harris's widow.

8 0

3 years ago