Answer<u>:</u>
<u>premise</u>
Explanation:
In premise reflection there is a certain question to one's own self that why do we need to relate it with our self.
As in the given case,
Cindy is concerned about her daughter's behaviour. For this she considers her childhood and compares that with her daughter's.
Further she questions herself whether is it required to compare her behaviour with that of her daughter. Since they are two different persons from different generations their behaviour can be different.
It is not necessary that if Cindy was outgoing her daughter has to be outgoing.
Accordingly when Cindy question herself and finds the solution in question itself that the behaviour of mother and daughter might not be same this shall be considered as premise reflection.
b they disappear behind closed elevator
Joe is most likely in the preoperational stage of
development. The preoperational stage is considered to be the second stage of
piaget’s theory to cognitive development where in this is the stage that the
child engages to learning to manipulate symbols and as well as engage to symbolic
play. This occurs in the age of two until seven.
Premise refers to a statement previously stated or assumed to be the basis of an argument or further argument.
Conclusion refers to a statement drawn as a result of the premises.
Argument is a series of statement so that the conclusion is a consequences of the premise.
(1) <em>Bill saw a turkey yesterday and it was brown</em>
Fact1: The turkey Bill saw yesterday was brown
Facts2: Bill could have see another turkey 2 days ago which is black
Facts 3: Someone else aside Bill could have seen a white turkey yesterday.
Therefore,
The conclusion drawn:
(2) <em>All turkeys are brown</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em>irrelevant to the argument.
<em>The premise is irrelevant to the conclusion.</em>
Read more:
brainly.com/question/3775579
False, but it will keep changing.
