Answer:
<h3>A. </h3>
Explanation:
<h2>Pa followe po thanks po </h2><h3>Sa na nakatulong</h3>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer:
This best illustrates source amnesia.
Explanation:
Source amnesia is a memory disorder that causes a person to remember a factual knowledge but also to distort contextual elements. The person has difficulty recalling where, when, or how they obtained such knowledge. This is related to a malfunctioning of explicit memory. In Mr. Adams's case, the distortion seems to be related as to how he obtained that knowledge. He can remember the monument, but not that he saw it through pictures. He thinks visiting the monument is how he formed that memory.
