Answer:
1) This situation is out of the standard set by Tarasoff decision’s duty to protect because the situation is severe and Dr. Yeung should not rely on probability. This could be possible that Aiden was trying to threaten Dr. Yeung and demanding no interference in his personal life. Dr. Yeung is a health psychologist but as a psychologist, she could understand the seriousness of the situation so she must call the professional support. Dr. Yeung should refer this case to the clinical psychologist and provide support to them about the health and behavior conditions.
2) Ethically, Dr. Yeung’s decision may affect the research purpose but morally her decision may help a person who needs it. The decision of Dr. Yeung was exceptional so it must be considered as an exceptional condition.
3) Dr. Yeung should consult the clinical psychologist and psychiatrists before handling this type of case. Dr. Yeung was not assigned to handle abnormal behavior problems and therapies, she could have handled the situation as an exceptional condition and with the help of team support.
4) Dr. Yeung should consider this case as health and abnormal behavior problem rather than a general condition. The behavior of Aiden was destructive and it should be analyzed with the help of security agencies, medical practitioner, psychologist and psychiatric. Dr. Yeung tried to done her job well but her lack of experience could have threaten her and patient’s life. I think, Dr. Yeung should demand professional help and experienced services.
Answer:
The correct answer is B, bloomers improved more on an IQ test than did non-bloomers.
Explanation:
The theory behind this experiment is that the treatment you give each individual affects their performance. Once labeled as bloomers those students became more confident and interested in class. The teachers were also affected, for they became more interested and paid closer attention to those individuals. Rosenthal and Jacobson would call that a self-fulfilling prophecy. At the end of the experience, it was noted that the IQ coefficiency of those students randomly labeled as bloomers had increased. The special subconscious treatment they had received by their teacher played an important role in those results.
Answer:
longitudinal study
Explanation:
Longitudinal studies are typically observational studies, as they are usually limited to observing the sample elements without manipulating factors that may alter the variables of interest. For example, to verify the effectiveness of a treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder, researchers can analyze the psychological status of the study subjects before and after treatment. This is because a longitudinal study is one that evaluates how the variables behave in the research participants over a given period of time.
Another example of this type of study is what is happening to Alice, where researchers ask her to answer a questionnaire each year so they can assess how her attitudes and preferences have changed over the course of a year.
You can search that up on the app socratic!
Answer:an adverb is a word that modifies a verb, adjective or another adverb, or sometimes a whole clause/sentence. It generally answers the question how? where? or when?
Some Examples:
yesterday (when?)---modifies the verb "arrived"
cautiously (how?)---modifies the verb "walked"
very (how?)---modifies the adverb "cautiously"
I hope I helps you.
