Answer:
$65,333
Explanation:
As we know,
Sales price = Variable cost + Contribution cost
Sales price = Variable cost ratio + Contribution margin ratio
100% = 30% + Contribution
Contribution = 100% - 30%
Contribution = 70%
Fixed cost = $19,600
Break even sales = Fixed cost / Contribution margin ratio
Break even sales = $19,600 / 30%
Break even sales = $19,600 / 0.3
Break even sales = $65,333.
Answer: Increase by $250
Explanation: As per the general rule of economics when there is an increase in income, that increase will eventually lead to increase in expenditure.
As, there is an increase in investment in the given case so it will result in increase in income for the economy.
We can compute it as :-
= $250
Therefore, the expenditure would increase by $250
Answer:
Replace existing equipment with newer, more efficient equipment. Although this option entails substantial up-front investment, you’re sure that you can more than make up the difference in lower production costs.
Explanation:
The action that is likely to have the highest initial cost in terms of its impact on other parts of the organization is to replace existing equipment with newer, more efficient equipment. Although this option entails substantial up-front investment, you’re sure that you can more than make up the difference in lower production costs. This because buying new equipment will require a big investment from the company at the beginning to cover its costs but this will later generate more productivity and lower production costs which will compensate the initial high cost.
The other options are not right because buying slightly lower-grade materials, including hardwood, aluminum, vinyl, and nylon can decrease the cost at the beginning but the company can have problems with the quality of the products which could be really costly. Also, lay off a portion of your workforce and then try to motivate everyone who’s left to work harder and this option also means selecting future hires from a lower-skill labor pool and paying lower wages will decrease labor costs at the beginning but can require a big investment later with the costs of the process to hire new people, compensations to the employees that were laid off and can also result on low quality job and productivity from lower-skill labor.
I believe its called a Systematic Investment Plan?
Options :
A) society would be better off with zero pollution.
B) society would be better off if emissions were increased.
C) command and control policies should always be used.
D) Society would be better off if emissions were reduced
Answer:
Explanation: The marginal damage resulting from an emission refers to the extra damage resulting from the extra unit of emission released. Whereby the marginal cost of abatement refers to the cost incurred in reducing one extra unit of pollution. Taking a look at the cost of marginal damage incurred, which is $100billion and the marginal cost of abatement which is $180 billion. From an economic standpoint, aive the abatement cost considerably outweighs the marginal damage, it spending $180 billion to cover for a loss of $ 100 billion seems unreasonable. Therefore the society will be better off if emissions were increased.
