All categories

3 years ago

Emily is a diver. Today she descended to a

Mathematics

2 answers:

natka813 [3]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

(-34)

Step-by-step explanation:

40 - 10 = 30 is equal to 30 feet below sea level. So, currently she is -30.

Then, she descends 4 more feet.

30 + 4 = 34 is your final answer, hope it helps you.

kotegsom [21]3 years ago

4 0

She was at 40 feet below, she swam up getting so she was then at 40-10 = 30 feet below sea level.

She the swan 4 feet down so she ended up at 30 + 4 = 34 feet below sea level.

The answer is 34 feet below sea level (-34)

You might be interested in

Someone please tell me what this is, the question is what is the slope of this line ?

AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

rise/run. y=2 x=3

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

- 3c ( 4x - 2y ) PLESE HELP ASAP I WILL GIVE 5 STARS AND BRAINLIEST

Orlov [11]

12cx+6yc pls mark as brainliest

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is 9.6+5.42-3.2 squared

Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

139.7124

Step-by-step explanation:

9.6+5.42-3.2 (^2)

11.82^2

= 139.7124

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Complete the statement using always, sometimes, or never. A rectangle is __________________ a rhombus.

Lesechka [4]

Hi!

A rectangle can sometimes be a rhombus if it has sides of all equal lengths. If a rectangle was a rhombus, it would also be a square. Furthermore, a square is always a rhombus.

Hope this helps! :)

7 0

3 years ago

Consider the following statement. If r is any rational number and s is any irrational number, then r s is irrational. (a) Which

olganol [36]

Answer:

(a) If r is any rational number and s is any irrational number, then r/s is rational

(b) The statement is false when r is 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

$r \to$ rational number

$s \to$ irrational number

$\frac{r}{s} \to$ irrational number

Solving (a): The negation

To get the negation of a statement, we only need to negate the end result

In other words, the number type of r and s will remain the same, but r/s will be negated.

So, the negation is:

$r \to$ rational number

$s \to$ irrational number

$\frac{r}{s} \to$ rational number

Solving (b): When r/s is irrational is false

Given that:

$\frac{r}{s} \to$ irrational number

Set r to 0

So:

$\frac{r}{s} = \frac{0}{s}$

$\frac{r}{s} = 0$ -- rational

<em>Hence, the statement is false when r is 0</em>

8 0

3 years ago