Answer:
Lincoln's contrast of free labour and slave labour is quite different as he did not base his argument on the fact that free labourers had the conset to work for a wage and slave labourer did not.
Explanation:
- Rather he argued that the difference was that among the free labourers there was hope to escape from the current condition to a better one whereas slave labourers lacked this kind of hope.
- It is not the consent that distinguishes free labour from slave labourers but rather the independence of choice the rise to own productive property and to work for oneself.

8 0

2 years ago

How did adam smith contribute to the economic way of thinking?

OLga [1]

Smith is also known for creating the concept of gross domestic product (GDP) and for his theory of compensating wage differentials. 2 According to this theory, dangerous or undesirable jobs tend to pay higher wages as a way of attracting workers to these positions.

Please mark brainliest

3 0

2 years ago

Constantinople's trade with Russia resulted in Byzantine influence in the areas of religion and

vichka [17]

Im taking the test now and i think that the first one is D

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Compare and contrast the regional cultures and economies of the English, French, and Spanish areas of control in the Americas. H

Dennis_Churaev [7]

British Colonies in the Americas were established by royal charter. French colonies started as fur trading posts and then developed later to common colonies. Spanish colonies were crown-sponsored conquests to find riches such as gold and silver.

The British colonies had population mostly from colonists that were recruited among middle-class farmers, servants, and convicted criminals. French colonies population were initially traders, merchants and missionaries, later some soldiers were given land there. Spanish colonies population consisted of conquerors, soldiers and missionaries.

The economy from each colony was different, in the British colony the economy was diverse and included mostly farming, fishing and trading products like tobacco, rice, timber, and fish. The French colony economy like said before, was established over fur trade and some plantations on the Mississippi valley. The Spanish colonies economy was a trading economy that consisted of farming but it was heavily regulated by the Spanish crown.

The British colony started with a friendly relationship with the Native Americans, eventually, things changed when they needed to get new land. The French colony relationship with Native Americans was good, they respected them and forged alliances. Spanish colony relationship with Native Americans was bad when they were not killed by soldiers, they were subjugated or converted to Christianity.

5 0

3 years ago