I'd say probably not. There's no room for any companies that are not owned by or allowed by the government. Mercantilists were interested mostly in exploiting peoples for natural resources. So no, it's not particularly fair to businesses or indigenous populations
Answer:
They voted for Hamilton’s debt plan.
Explanation:
Initially, they voted against Hamilton's debt plan. Madison convinced Jefferson that allowing Hamilton's plan would give the central government too much power. However, Hamilton used the issue of the capital as a bargaining chip. His plan was eventually approved and the central government paid the debt by issuing national bonds.
They Would Have To Pay Taxs For The War And Families Would Loose People That They Loved During The War.The Prices On Things Would Go Up And It Could Be Possible That There Could Be A Draft If They Loose To Many People.They Would Loose Land From The War And The Diffrent Countries Would Fight Over Land And Try To Conquer Land.
<span>The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act - Title 28, 1330, 1332, 1391(f), 1441(d), and 1602 1611 of the United States Code places limits on suing foreign sovereign nations in State or Federal courts.
The law should not include exceptions for state-sponsored terrorism.
These offences are direct attacks against a nation and are covered within context of any other attack on the nation or its people.</span>
Most native tribes had allied with the French during the conflict, and they soon found themselves dissatisfied by British rule. In May 1763, just a few months after the formal conclusion of the Seven Years’ War, a pan-tribal confederacy led by Ottawa chief Pontiac rose up in rebellion. His warriors attacked a dozen British forts, capturing eight of them, and raided numerous frontier settlements. Hundreds died in the process. In response, the British handed out smallpox-infected blankets to Pontiac’s followers. Moreover, a gang of whites known as the Paxton Boys massacred 20 defenseless Native Americans who had nothing to do with the fighting.