Answer:
% in T bills = 18.92%, % in P = 81.08%
Explanation:
Portfolio return = Weighted average return
Return of portfolio P = 0.14*0.6 + 0.10*0.4
Return of portfolio P = 0.124
Let % money in T bills be x
0.11 = 0.05*x + 0.124*(1-x)
0.11 = 0.05x + 0.124 - 0.124x
0.014 = 0.074x
x = 18.92%
Hence, % in T bills = 18.92%, % in P = 81.08%
Answer:
$21000
Explanation:
To determine Gray’s tax basis for a 50% interest in the Fabco Partnership, The interest is increased by the partner’s distributive share of all partnership items of income and decreased by the partner’s distributive share of all loss and deduction items.
Gray’s beginning basis = $5,000
Gray’s 50% distributive share of ordinary income = 50% × $20000 = $10000
Gray’s 50% tax-exempt income= 50% × $8000 = $4,000 and
portfolio income = 50% × $4000 = $2,000
Therefore, the ending basis of Gray’s Fabco partnership interest = $5000 + $10000 + $4000 + $2000 = $21000
Given:
salary: <span>$10.50 an hour
25 hours a week
expenses:
Cellphone bill: $65/month
car insurance: $1,200/yr
*20% taxes.
There is no specific question but I will solve for Marcus net earnings for the year.
25 hours/week * 52 weeks/yr = 1,300 hours/year
Wages: 10.50 per hour * 1,300 hours/year = $13,650 Gross salary per year
Taxes: 13,650 * 20% = 2,730
13,650 - 2,730 = 10,920 net salary for the year
Cell phone bill: 65 per month * 12 months = 780
Net salary: 10,920
Cell phone bill (780)
Car insurance: <u> (1,200)</u>
Net Income: 8,940 per annum.
</span>
Answer:
Overhead application rate
= <u>Budgeted overhead</u>
Budgeted machine hours
= <u>$900,000</u>
30,000 hours
= $30 per machine hour
Overhead cost assigned to the product
= Overhead application rate x Actual machine hours
= $30 x 12,000 hours
= $360,000
Explanation:
In this case, there is need to determine the overhead application rate, which is the ratio of budgeted overhead to budgeted machine hours.
Then, we will obtain the overhead cost assigned to the product by multiplying the overhead application rate by actual machine hours.
Real estate experts should not provide advice
on tax implications. this is because to offer such an advice the expert need training and knowlidge on state and federal tax laws. Tax laws are complex and varies from state to state which requires a considerable high level training. ina ddition, the laws keep on changing as new budgets are read,and the expert may not be conversant with any change.
