Answer:
hiii 7272<>*~_+89×[0<×<×*×
perpendicular lines have a slope that is a negative reciprocal
A) 4x-5y=5
subtract 4x
solve for y
-5y = -4x+5
divide by -5
y = 4/5 x+5 slope is 4/5 perpendicular slope is -5/4
y -y1 =m(x-x1) point slope form of a line
y-3 = -5/4 (x-5)
B) 5x+4y = 37
subtract 5x
4y =-5x +37
divide by 4
y =-5/4 x +37/4 slope is -5/4 perpendicular slope is 4/5
y -y1 =m(x-x1) point slope form of a line
y-3 = 4/5 (x-5)
C)4x+5y=5
subtract 4x
5y = -4x +5
divide by 5
y = -4/5 x +1
y =-4/5 x +1 slope is -4/5 perpendicular slope is 5/4
y -y1 =m(x-x1) point slope form of a line
y-3 = 5/4 (x-5)
D)5x-4y=8
subtract 5x
-4y = -5x+8
divide by -4
y = 5/4 x-2
y =5/4 x +-2 slope is 5/4 perpendicular slope is -4/5
y -y1 =m(x-x1) point slope form of a line
y-3 = -4/5 (x-5)
Answer:
No, I do not agree with the conjecture because 1 is not a prime number.
Step-by-step explanation:
A prime number is one that can be divided by 1 and itself only. Thus it can be expressed in 2 factors only, 1 and the number itself.
Examples are; 2, 3, 5, 13, 19 , 23 etc.
So, 2 = 1 x 2
3 = 1 x 3
23 = 1 x 23
Prime numbers must be expressed as the product of 1 and the number.
The conjecture that every prime number can be expressed as the product of two prime numbers is false. Because 1 is not a prime number, since it has no 2 factors.
We know that these two angles are equal to each other (There is the "congruent" sign) so we can set them equal to each other and solve for x
3x - 17 = 25 - 3x
(3x + 3x) - 17 = 25 + (-3x + 3x)
6x + (- 17 + 17) = 25 + 17
6x/6 = 42/6
x = 7
Hope this helped!
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation: