Answer: Rainsford ultimately has to decide if he will kill or be killed.
There are a lot of dark actions in this story, and the above quick synopsis highlights two of them: General Zaroff decides to hunt humans for sport, and Rainsford has to decide whether to kill Zaroff or get killed. The intentions and eotions, as you can imagine, are diverse: fear of death, anger at being hunted, the need to survive... there are more, but this will give you a start.
Explanation:
Because it is asking what Rainsford had to decide that was really dark
What is C.tense and uncomfortable for 400
A adjective because "The true king of the beasts is the elephant" is describing the elephant
There is no passage and answer choices, so it is impossible to answer this question. I apologise.
The three components of a scientific argument are:
1- THE CLAIM
The claim is a conclusion achieved that answers the original question.
2- THE EVIDENCE
The evidence is used to support the claim. It has to be sufficient, correct qualitative, quantitative and appropiate.
3- THE REASONING
The reasoning is the part that links the claim with the evidence, showing why the data correctly supports the claim made at the begining of the process.
