I believe the answer is: an unconditioned response
an unconditioned response refers to a form of response that naturally exist within an individual without having to be learned. In operant conditioning, unconditioned response is the initial behaviour before any modification where new behaviour is paired with a trigger is being made.
C). The ability of citizens to vote for Senators directly.
Answer:
sexual sadism
Explanation:
Sexual sadism: In abnormal psychology, the term sexual sadism is defined as a mental disorder in which an individual faces or experiences sexual arousal as a result of humiliation, suffering, or extreme pain of another person. It can involve other conditions and elicit pain. It can also be referred to as a form of paraphilia yet not harmful and do not fulfill the criteria of paraphilia disorder.
Treatment: Medication and psychotherapy including cognitive-behavioral therapy.
In the question above, the given statement is an example of sexual sadism.
Answer:
Heuristic thinking
Explanation:
This form of thinking involves educated and calculated guess, it involves critical thinking that leads to a major decision. It can be understood that Raul is trying to figure out the right man for the job, convergent thinking is used majorly in questions and answers, trying to pick this right answer from the question, same goes to divergent as that is the opposite of convergent. The best thinking that explains what Raul is trying to figure out is heuristic thinking.
Answer: Sutton's offense will not be recorded because it is part of what is called the dark figure of the crime.
Explanation:
In the field of criminology or sociology, the dark figure of the crime can be defined as the number of crimes that have not been reported or discovered.
Just as many reported crimes are seen daily and investigations to find out who has committed it, there are also times where crimes cannot be proven due to lack of evidence or perhaps they happened but were never reported.
Situations have been seen where innocent people are convicted of poor evidence or people who are guilty but lack of evidence cannot ensure that the person is guilty. There are also cases where there are crimes that are not reported because the person does not trust justice or the person may feel guilty for what happened to him.
In the case of Sutton, although it is true that at the end of the day he did not steal anything and that the owner of the house could not detect anything because everything was intact, this does not mean that the crime did not happen. If the owner of the house had security cameras or found Sutton in the house, it would have been proof that he was trying to steal even if he didn't carry anything.
If Sutton had been found there would be chances of being imprisoned or other judicial actions would have been taken because entering a house without permission and that is a crime.
