Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's true because if you don't maintain your structure then you might not be as strong. Happy to help :)
Answer:
parol evidence
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the admission of Brogan's testimony is most likely governed by the parol evidence rule. This rule created to prevent a party from introducing evidence before the agreement was made final in order to change the existing contract. Which is what Brogan is doing in this scenario by trying to release evidence about his age before the finalization of the contract.
Should be A. Hope this helps!
