Part A:
The number of outcomes that each of them will have to choose anyone at random is calculated below.
n = 3 x 3 = 9
This is because, Al will have 3 choices and similarly, Bill will also have three choices. These outcomes are as written below.
S = (1,1), (1,2), (1,3), (2, 1), (2,2), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 2), and (3,3)
Part B: To make the same choice, there will only be three outcomes. These are:
S = (1, 1), (2, 2) and (3, 3)
Part C: If neither of them will vote for 2, there will only be four outcomes. This is because each of them will only have two choices. These are:
S = (1, 1), (1, 3), (3, 1), and (3,3)
Under normal conditions, a firm's expected ROE would probably be higher if it financed with short-term rather than with long-term debt, but using short-term debt would probably increase the firm's risk.
Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In business finance, the productivity of an undertaking, also defined as net assets or asset minus debt, is a calculation of its viability with respect to equity.ROE is a calculation about how well funds are used to produce increases in profits.
Companies are able to fund themselves with stocks and bonds. A business will raise its investment value by increasing the number of debt capital compared to its equity capital. There was a misunderstanding. Then you see that the new company has a better ROE because of its financial resources as you split the net income per shareholder's capital stock.
Answer:
A) 9 Pounds of Fish Per Bottle of Wine
Explanation:
A few things should be explained
1. Opportunity Cost - this is the benefit or value of the next best choice that has to be sacrificed when a choice is made between several alternatives.
2. Comparative Advantage: This describes the advantage when a business, individual or even a nation is able to maunfacture a good or offer a service at an opportunity cost that is lower than other competitors in the business. It simply means the ability to produce a good or service at a cost cheaper than one's competitors.
Step 1: By comparing the opportunity cost of producing wine in the two countries, you can tell that Spain (ability to produce a bottle for 4 pounds of fish as compard to 10 pounds by Sweden) has a comparative advantage in the production of wine
Also Comparing the opportunity cost of wine as well, Sweden has the comparative advantage in the production of fish (10 pounds of fish as compared to 3 pounds that can be produced by Spain for a bottle of while).
Step 2: The Trading of wine and fish between Spain and Sweden
a) as long as Spain is able to get more than 4 pounds of fish (what it can produce) for every exported bottle of wine, then it can gain from a trade with Sweden.
b) Also , as long as Sweden is able to receive more than 1/10 bottles of wine for each pound of fish it exports to Spain, it can gain from the specialization and trade.
Step 3: Prices of trade (of wine in terms of fish) will allow both Sweden and Spain gain from Trade.
The correct answer is 9 Pounds of Fish per bottle of Wine. This is correct because Spain can get more than the minimum 4 pounds of fish it needs and Sweden can receive more than 1/10 the bottles of wine it needs to make a gain.
Answer:
Psychological barrier
Explanation:
The type of barrier that you are experiencing is psychological. Psychological barriers result when your personal values are not aligned with the message being received, be it by cultural or ethical values or even by preconceived thoughts. In this situation, since you do not agree with the task at hand of changing the method for keeping the accounts, you find it difficult to focus on the task.
