Available Options are:
a) growth
b) yield
c) tax consequences
d) liquidity
Answer:
Option D. Liquidity
Explanation:
The reason is that Leslie is worried about having back its money that will be invested in the time of need. So she sure that the amount will be required in the coming future and that she wants to earn a small profit for the time being. So the money worries are also referred to as liquidity concerns.
I believe the answer is: Reduce the benefit level
If the individual performing an occupation more hazardous than the occupation listed in his policy, The insurance company had the right to perceive that the individual is involving himself in necessary risk, which provide them with a legal ground to reduce his benefit level.
Answer:
<u>Lateral moraine</u>
Explanation:
It is important to note the duration of years here; 150 years ago. The Lateral moraine is a very familiar image when dealing with glaciers.
Therefore, the Lateral moraine would be most useful for tracing valuable gold deposits back to their bedrock source area since it is also an unconsolidated debris that is found on the side of glaciers.
Answer:
Suppose that a chicken farm uses a nearby stream to dispose of the wastes released by its chickens. These wastes flow downstream into a lake that has become thick with algae and polluted due to the minerals in the waste matter. The local office of a nonprofit environmental organization successfully lobbies state regulators to stop the farm's pollution.
It's important to note that sometimes private solutions to externalities do not work. For example, this occurs when communications barriers or social customs are important enough relative to the potential gains involved that a private solution is not feasible.
Explanation:
The type of private solution to the externality of pollution occurred in this case is Charities
, because the work done by a non-profit organization is a form of charity.
It is crucial to note that sometimes private solutions to externalities do not work for example, this occurs when one party repeatedly holds out for a better deal.This describes the problem of a breakdown in bargaining.