1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
trasher [3.6K]
2 years ago
12

As the main speaker in a debate write your contribution against the motion teachers should not be allowed to use Cane's on stude

nts
​
English
1 answer:
Scrat [10]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

(Name) Here,

    Schools have long banned corporal punishment. But now there is a debate about whether the decision to ban corporal punishment in schools was the right one and whether it should be reinstated.

1. It is wrong and inappropriate.

No, because

  • Using physical force to discipline or punish a child clearly violates basic human rights. A child's right to safety is stated in Article 19 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. To protect children, all services should ensure that definitions of abuse do not condone any form of sexual activity. Corporal punishment is both legally and morally wrong. There are plenty of alternatives to beating a child! For example, a parent can deny children privileges, restrict their hobbies, or even force them to work to make amends for bad behavior. behavior. However, physically harming a child is completely unnecessary. What would it be like if the conductor was beaten instead of the other way around? No way.

Yes, because...

  • So, by having this article, you are saying that parents or teachers cannot punish their children. misbehaving in school and at home? If we all follow this article and do not punish our children, how are we supposed to "strike the fear of God into them"? How do we punish children? Already have kids It will become a "living hell" if this continues and corporal punishment is used. Because I used to be a kid, I know that slapping a kid's hand or grounding them does nothing but make them more defiant towards rules. How are we preparing them for the real world? You blew it. The cops won't smack your hand and corner you. But the ramifications will be huge. So, do you want a disciplined or a lawless generation? You say...

2. Discriminates against children with disabilities.

No, because

  • Because of panic attacks, repeated bullying, or lack of self-control, I did many bad things as a child with Asperger's. In my desperation to remove something from the classroom that I disliked. No way physical I would not have given in to punishment. I would have been seriously injured if I had been left alone to work in a room. This would be fine if teachers could tell the difference between troubled children and those who can be helped, but they can't and don't often. Anyway, I sympathize.

Yes Because...

  • I believe it is obvious that a child would not be admitted to school if his or her parents were unaware of any behavioral issues. Keeping in mind that most cases are publicity stunts, we are to blame. Isolate. Of course, this is still used today, but it seems to fail with anger. People think it's cool to break the rules to impress friends or family. admirers. Embarrassment is my preferred method of deterring bad behavior.

3. It raises crime and violence.

No, because

  • Corporal punishment has been linked to increased aggression, substance abuse, and criminality. Because they don't know any better, many victims of corporal punishment lash out and repeat the abuse. In other words, it teaches kids to be violent. Violence and crime are increased by corporal punishment. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) agrees, stating that "the more children are spanked, the more adult anger they report, the more likely they are to spank their own children and approve of child abuse. In adulthood, the more married they are, the more marital conflict they have. Thus, corporal punishment not only starts violence does not only affects children's lives as adults. The government should work to reduce violence, not increase it by reintroducing one of its founders.

Yes because...

  • This claim is unsupported by data. There's a reason. Because statistics show that after corporal punishment was made illegal, crime increased by 67%. The data strongly support reintroducing corporal punishment.

    Finally, I oppose corporal punishment. That's because if someone has punched someone or done anything violent to someone, you're basically hitting them and telling them that violence isn't the answer. Also, if you do this to them, you are teaching them that violence is acceptable and they may do it to you later. Because you taught them it was okay. Also, they may commit crimes because of you. 70% of these kids are known to have a troubled future due to past corporal punishment. A lot of today's kids have a bad attitude, so the cane or any other corporal Some teachers have favorites who are not punished if they do wrong, and non-favorites who are disliked. People who did nothing wrong got the cane or any other corporal punishment. This would be unfair and considered favoritism.

Thanks for listening,

You might be interested in
Read the objective summary of “The Rights to the Streets of Memphis.”
Mrac [35]

Answer:

The important detail that should be added to this summary is "The author’s father left the family with nothing."

Explanation:

This summary of "The Rights to the Streets of Memphis.” by Richard Wright need to include the detail that triggers all the following events, that the author's father abandons them and left them without any money or security, sets the new kind of life that each one of them will have to deal with to survive without him and his income.

7 0
3 years ago
Normal wear and road conditions can take their toll on a car’s steering and suspension system, altering
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

wheeling alignments

Explanation:

driversed was fun

8 0
3 years ago
Argument A:
iris [78.8K]

Explanation:

The claim for this argument is that you and your parents don't have the same perspective of things.

3 0
3 years ago
Can some one help me on my question
Luden [163]
Intrinsic motivation is a motivation "from inside", with internal, rather than external awards.

Three of the things you mentioned have an external reward: the 500 Dollar prize( first option), the credit (third) and the hope of winning a blue ribbon (the last).
Only the second one has an intrinsic motivation: that you will be happy about performing this song (feeling proud of yourself, etc).
6 0
3 years ago
How does Dakota’s question, “Is repetition a form of figurative language” redirect and further the discussion?
luda_lava [24]

Answer:The entire ride is the complete subject of the sentece. This implies all the words that describe who or what is the sentence is about. In this case, the action is take and we know that is about the ride, so the subject is ride.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read the sentence. After Congress passed the funding bill, the President agreed to sign it into law. Identify the subordinate cl
    9·2 answers
  • Please help! English!
    8·1 answer
  • Main difference between an oxymoron and a paradox
    10·1 answer
  • The Odyssey book 5 study questions help!! I don't know any of these! Please!
    10·2 answers
  • Helpppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
    5·1 answer
  • Which sentence is an example of the word "melodic"?
    10·2 answers
  • Sandra went to the movies with David and (I, me). (1 point) <br> I <br> me
    12·1 answer
  • 2 questions: brainliest+14 points
    5·2 answers
  • How does the syntax in this passage help develop the characterization of the narrator? Incomplete sentences and short phrases em
    6·2 answers
  • "List at least one critical approach from the assigned readings related to literary criticism/critical approaches that you think
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!