Can best be described as members of a group that are specifically targeted and killed by another group
English and French Kingdoms had both similarities and differences, during the late 1600's.
Both had a monarchical system, with a king ruling the country.
However, France had been under the rule of Louis XIV for over 60 years by the end of the 17th century, thus, he had consolidated his power, and the crown's power above everything. He eliminated the remnants of feudalism still left across France and imposed a rule of absolute monarchy.
In contrast to the English kingdom, where the parliament was powerful enough to denounce King James II for abuse of power through the use of the Bill of Rights, and was a solid institution with the authority to depose the king if needed. The English kingdom had clear limits on the Crown's power and authority, and several tax and civil right laws could not be emitted without the Parliaments permission.
Answer: an intense military campaign intended to bring about a swift victory.
Explanation: that’s what the dictionary says. Hope this helps?
Hey there!
Let's first say what a primary source really is.
A primary source is a source created by a person who was actually there. They've written about their experiences, and are primary (as in first) because the information is valid. It's proven by a real witness. This is not to be confused with a secondary source-- an account written by someone who wasn't there but has info, like a textbook.
When you're evaluating a primary source, you should ask if the person is writing about their experience in that particular event, and if the information seems valid. You should also make sure nothing is necessarily cited and such- and detail and usually opinion can be present.
Primary source example:
An autobiography- the person whom the story was about was there and is writing about their life.
Hope this helps!
