Answer:
The French traded furs for iron tools, kettles, wool blankets, and other supplies, while Native Americans exchanged furs for items from all over the world.
Explanation:
Before Europeans arrived in the mid-1600s, Native Americans traded throughout the rivers of present-day Minnesota and across the Great Lakes. Following that, European American traders traded manufactured products for precious furs with Native Americans for approximately 200 years.
Fur-bearing animals were mostly trapped by the Dakota and Ojibwe in the Northwest Territory. In the region's forests and streams, they obtained a variety of furs, the most important of which was beaver. Traders from France, the United Kingdom, and the United States offered blankets, rifles and ammunition, fabric, metal tools, and brass kettles in return for the furs.
(Hope this helps can I pls have brainlist (crown)☺️)
Answer:
Anthony Benezet is recognized as the founder of the antislavery movement in America in the mid-1700s. Benezet believed the British ban on slavery should have been extended to the colonies, and worked to convince his Quaker brethren that slave-owning was not consistent with Christian doctrine.
Explanation:
Yes I know I got it off the internet but fr this will help you :>
Answer:
I disagree
Explanation:
The colonies wanted war against Britain
Answer: 4. The Native Americans were not included in any of the Treaty proceedings and were forced to give up their lands over time
Explanation:
Though the treaty ended hostilities between Great Britain and the newly formed U.S. , recognizing it as a soveirgn nation, Britain did nothing to protect Native Americans on the proceedings. The U.K. continued to supply natives with manufactured goods and guns in exchange of furs with the hope that they would stop or hinder westward expansion into the Ohio territory from american settlers, but no legal protection was granted, and over time, american settlers came to dominate and eventually displace Native Americans from their territory.
Answer:
In the Hebrew Bible, the captivity in Babylon is presented as a punishment for idolatry and disobedience to Yahweh in a similar way to the presentation of Israelite slavery in Egypt followed by deliverance.
