Answer:
The best example of legal pluralism is that Indian litigants could have their cases tried in local or British courts, with their own legal customs applied.
Explanation:
Legal pluralism is a situation in which a territory has several different legal orders and legal systems, often based on the fact that society consists of several social groups with different cultures and traditions or that a state territory has shared sovereignty within, therefore having two nations applying their respective laws. In a situation where there is legal pluralism, the individual group affiliation will determine which legal order the person's case belongs to, or also which legal system the case is processed in. Legal pluralism is in contrast to legal centralism, which is characterized by a common legal order in a territory.
"<span>a. The rising power of the Ottoman Empire restricted their overland access to Asian trade" is the best option since many trade routes were taken away. </span>
Answer:
Conditioned Stimulus
Explanation:
The conditioned stimulus in pavlovian conditioning is an unique advantage that becomes linked with the unconditioned stimulus and eventually triggers a reflex. When delivered alone, an initially neutral stimulus that is coupled with an unconditioned stimulus ultimately elicits the desired reaction in an organism.
Ancient societies would have benefited heavily from the use of bridges because it allowed for movement in and out of different civilizations
