Weighted Shortest Job First gives preference to jobs with characteristics such as, first, the size of the project (smaller is better) Second, the value of the project (higher is better).
In order to determine a relative ranking, Weighted Shortest Job First (WSJF) uses a technique for assigning a weight, or value, to each job, and then by dividing that by the length of the job. It also gives preference to jobs with characteristics such as the size and value for a project.
Weighted Shortest Job First is a prioritization model used to sequence jobs eg., capabilities, features, and epics in order to produce maximum economic benefit.
Hence, WSJF prefers such characteristics.
To learn more about a project here:
brainly.com/question/14546345
#SPJ4
Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.
Answer:
The level of sales in units is 7,400
Explanation:
The computation of the level of sales in units is shown below:
= (Fixed cost + target income) ÷ (Contribution margin per unit)
= ($286,200 + $106,000) ÷ ($163 per unit - $110 per unit)
= $392,200 ÷ $53 per unit
= 7,400 units
The Contribution margin per unit is
= Selling price per unit - variable cost per unit
Henec, the level of sales in units is 7,400
They can import and then industrialize.
Answer:
a. 1, 5 and 7
b. Resources will be allocated inefficiently
c. Differing sizes and capacities
d. Benefits due to economies of scale
e. Reduce prices and improve resource allocation.
Explanation:
The correct combination is 1, 5 and 7. The price of a pure monopoly firm is much higher than that of purely competitive firm because the later is a price taker while the former is a price fixer. Because of this, output of monopoly is lower while the profit margin is higher than that of competitive firm.
Assuming that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In the case of a pure monopolist, resources will be allocated inefficiently because the monopolist does not produce at the point of minimum Average Total Cost and does not equate price and Marginal cost.
Even though both monopolists and competitive firms follow the MC = MR rule in maximizing profits, there are differences in the economic outcomes because pure competitors lack capacity and are smaller in size while the monopolist has the capacity to expand inorder to maximize profits.
The costs of a purely competitive firm and a monopoly may be different because the monopolist is capable of taking advantage of cost reduction arising from economics of scale. Pure competitors does not experience economies of scale due to their small sizes.
If a monopoly can experience economies of scale, it can reduce prices beyond that of the pure competitor thereby ensuring a more efficient resource allocation.
