Answer:
I am sorry you didn't give me eny textual suport
Explanation:
Answer:
C, because getting familiar with the audience, or mock audience, leads to you not being nervous to talk.
These two men likely would not long tolerate the other's opinion if put in the same room for any length of time.
Both were theologians. Both wrote in the 1800s. Both were of the same denomination, and yet both were on opposite sides of the slavery question. Both used powerful language to uphold their own point of view. Finally both used scripture and argument to back up their point of view.
The argument is <em>that children go to school to learn not to teach their elders ,</em> where teachers can be included. Public schools are subsidised with taxes. Bearing this in mind, we may say that taxpayers send their children to school for them to learn not to teach. This was what the taxpayers did when <em>they themselves </em>were students . Therefore, t<em>axpayers send their children to school on the premise that, at their age, they needed to learn, not teach </em>is the reasoning of the argument.
☆ answer ☆
D. the nation's financial structure
☆explanation☆
"and the whole financial structure of the nation had been shaken to its foundations"
hope this helps! :))
