Answer:
The given sentence is a first person point of view statement where the protagonist is kind of embarrassed about the fact that Mrs. Weignad saw him in the soccer game.
Explanation:
This is a key sentence here, because the plot can take any turn from this point. Mrs. Weigand, may be a sweet lady or an inquisitively notorious lady which may cause trouble to the protagonist as the plot goes. Anyway the given sentence has a potential to change the course of the plot.
supports the view that people thought the Civil War would be over much quicker than it actually did.
The correct answer is I, II, and III.
The first sentence support the thesis statement by using a metaphor: it compares a settler cleaning weeds from a corn field with men killing all types of life to comfortably settle in a land.
The second sentence expresses how men have devoted years and centuries developing and improving different types of weapons that would make them better killers.
And the third sentence shows that man has taken his desire for killing so far that he even wants to kill the microorganisms that live in their homes.
There is a whole series of events where the original rules were altered. Originally the pigs lived under a constitution of 8 commandments. One of them was about alcohol which was forbidden. In this scene it was altered to be allowed in moderation.
Sleeping in beds was also forbidden. That was altered to sleeping in beds with sheets. So you have to choose between B C or D which all have truth in them. The other animals all know that there is something wrong, but they cannot use the law to right things. The pigs have foreseen that they might resort to this and have changed the law so it now allows them to do what they are doing. Nobody has a copy of the original constitution.
So what do we pick? Barley does not have to be used for beer. Some of the animals (like the horses) are vegetarians and barley would be a treat. It is true that the pigs had the barley planted, but never for the benefit of others. B is true, but it is not ironic.
They prohibited alcohol when they took over the farm. That is a fact.
What is ironic is that they discovered that alcohol in limited amounts was enjoyable and so they modified the constitution to suit the fact.
That makes C the answer, which I like as an answer. It is not only ironic, it shows the hypocrisy of the pigs. They didn't legalize drinking entirely, just the right to have a little bit. Who defines that? They do.
Apparently the answer from outside sources is D. So that's what you should go with.
<span>D. past perfect
</span><span><span>Danielle had practiced her song many times before last week’s recital.
</span>
HAD practiced
</span><span>The tense of the underlined verb in the sentence: We had just begun to practice the skit when the fire alarm rang is past perfect. Notice the conditioning word “when” which dictates the sentence to be in the past perfect state in its action verb. Hence, “had” is added next to the past participle of the sentence. For example, the boy had played when suddenly his mom came. </span>
