One reason is the policy of salutary neglect. Salutary neglect was a policy of Britain which basically meant that the colonies didn't have to follow all the British laws as long as they didn't cause any problems. People were satisfied with ti because they weren't bothered by Britain. When the French-Indian war ended, the policy of salutary neglect was abandoned and the crown started pressuring people more to obey the laws and this caused mass dissatisfaction.
Another is the political power that they had. Before 1763, they were allowed to purchase land and deal with the natives in such purchases and if they were rich enough they could even start their own colonies as governors or rule their own colony as a company. This was forbidden after 1763 and all governing started belonging to the British crown exclusively.
<span>The answer is ‘they wanted to maintain their strong fur trading relationship’. Samuel de Champlain was the first Frenchman to meet the Algonquins in the early 1600s and the native peoples started trading fur for arms. This established them as key players in the trading of fur.</span>
The first one is C. The second one is D.
I think that George Washington would not approve. People are only becoming more divided, he would say. This is due to the fact that he was never fond of political parties as he felt strongly that they would tear the world apart. When he retired he shared his thoughts with everyone and those were that in the future these parties were to separate people rather bringing them together like George Washington had done. He felt like his hard work would be for nothing and the nation would be back to the beginning.