Answer:
Names: Pennsylvania State Penitentiary, State Correctional Facility, PDOC.
Explanation:
Criminal Case- A case involving a state or federal crime. (Murder, Petty Theft, etc)
Civil Case- A case between civilians, often a lawsuit.
Plaintiff- The person summoning the defendant to court
Defendant- The person summoned by the Plaintiff to court.
Parole- Release of an inmate early, with frequent checks for alcohol, drugs, and associate partners.
What effect length- Age of suspect, Age of victim (if applicable), if the crime hurt, or killed a Policeman or Military.
C, if a intellectually normal student does not follow certain procedures then the individual has a behavioral disorder.
Answer:
The statement is true or false.
Explanation:
<em>Reafforestation which is the process of replanting trees</em> in order to regenerate the lost trees in a particular region is a simple way of fighting tree losses due to the activities of commercial lumber companies and ranchers.
Normally, <em>an average tree takes between 1 year and 10 years</em> to grow up to maturity. The more trees are cut down, t<em>he more the soil macro and micro fauna are disrupted</em>. Inorder to regenrate the exploited areas, it it highly encouraged to leave those areas for few years to be able to recover fully.
You can find the information from this link:
http://discovermagazine.com/2013/dec/22-20-things-you-didnt-know-aboutneanderthals
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
