Answer:
Notifying Serena of any material changes
Explanation:
With Serena now serving as their (Mark and debbie Calhoun) agents, it is paramount that Serena (the agent) be notified about any material changes made by the buyers. The buying agents (in this case Serena) is an individual or organization that is responsible for purchasing goods or property on behalf of another person. They are usually license professionals who search and undergo the purchasing procedure of products that their clients is interested in owning.
Answer:
The answer is option C. She may immediately sell the bonds but it is unclear how much money they will sell for.
Explanation:
She may immediately sell the bonds but it is unclear how much money they will sell for.
Investors who hold onto their bonds until maturity are assured of to receive the face value of the bond. In our case, if Andrea would have chosen to hold her $5,000 bond investment for 10 years, she would have been assured the bonds face value, however since she prefers to use the cash to work abroad, she can sell the bonds immediately.
Selling a bond before it's maturity date can either be beneficial or detrimental. This depends on the value of the bond at the time of sale. If at the time of sale the bond would have gained value, then the bond will sell at a higher price than when it was bought. On the other hand, if the bond at the time of sale has lost value, then the bond will sell at a lower price than the price which it was bought.
In our case, the best option for Andrea would be to sell the bonds immediately, since she really needs the cash. If it happens that at the point at which she sells the bonds they will have gained value, then she will have more than $5,000 cash, however, if at the point she decides to sell the bonds they will have lost value, then she will have less than $5,000 depending on how much value was lost from the time she bought the bonds and the time she sold the bonds.
This example is a Measuring test, this is provided by standard and deviation.
C.
pretty sure that’s right but if not, sorry!
Answer:
Th answer is: I would reward the managers of restaurants 1 and 2
Explanation:
In my opinion Marcia should reward the two managers from restaurants 1 and 2 based upon the percentage of sales increase. She could give an X$ bonus to the manager of restaurant 1 as a prize for increasing sales by two percent. Then she could also give the manager of restaurant 2 the same X$ bonus but also give him (or her) a 3% raise.
I wouldn´t take any type of actions regarding the manager of restaurant 3. I would be let him know that I was rewarding the other managers because they performed better than him. I believe that rewards are usually more beneficial than punishments. I also believe people are selfish and greedy, so when manager 3 realizes he lost the opportunity of earning a bonus and a raise due to his poor performance, he will be motivated to work better next year.
