Nipennie and Mirasa, two developing countries, bartered cotton for jute rather than for currency. In this scenario, the two countries engaged in counter-trade.
Explanation:
Counter-trade is an internal mode of trade through which products and services are traded instead of hard currency for any other products or services. For developing nations with restricted exchange or credit services, this form of global trade is more prevalent.
Counter-trade can be divided into 3 main categories: trade, counter purchase and reimbursement.
The earliest counter-trade practice is bartering. An important advantage of counter trade is that it makes foreign exchange savings simpler. Complex agreements, increased costs and logistic problems are rising drawbacks of counter trade.
Answer:
The tax on Kaitlyn's capital gain was $100
Explanation:
In order to calculate the tax on Kaitlyn's capital gain we would have to calculate first the Nominal capital gain as follows:
nominal capital gain=$400 - $200
nominal capital gain= $200
Therefore, tax on Kaitlyn's capital gain= tax percentage×nominal capital gain
=50%×$200
=$100
The tax on Kaitlyn's capital gain was $100
C. prototyping, does it makes sense now.
Answer:
a.- $ 3,529.82
b.- $ 3,512.11
c.- $ 132,77
Explanation:
In each case, we must calculate the value of their current savings and the additional investment.
The saving are the same for each scenario so let's calculate that first:
Principal 1,500.00
time 15 years
rate 0.01000
Amount 1,741.45
Then we add the funds generated from the investment:
a.- 110 annuity due for 15 month:
C $ 110
time 15 months
rate 0.01
FV $1,788.3651
We add the savings and get a total of: $ 3,529.82
b.- 110 ordinary annuity
C $ 110
time 15 months
rate 0.01
FV $1,770.6585
Plus, original savings of 1,741.45 = 3,512.11
c.-
If they need 3,900 then the fund must cover the difference between these and the savings future value:
3,900 - 1,741.45 = 2,158.55
Now we calculate the PMT, considering the payment are at the beginning:
FV $ 2,158.55
time 15
rate 0.01
C $ 132.770
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, in such a situation the promise must be written and signed by both parties in order for it to be enforceable. This is mainly due to the fact that the promise is being made for circumstances regarding a third individual which therefore makes this a Collateral promise. Collateral Promises must be written and signed in order for it to take effect and protect all parties involved from backing out of the contract, which doing so would be considered fraud.