Answer:
$16,393.44
Explanation:
Calculation for what would be your gain
Gain=$1,000,000/($0.61 per AUD)*$0.62 per AUD - $1,000,000
Gain=1,639,344*$0.62 per AUD - $1,000,000
Gain=$16,393.44
Therefore what would be your gain if you use $1,000,000 and execute locational arbitrage will be $16,393.44
Dole's marketing tactic is the Concept Review.All promotion movements are planned to inform, encourage, or remind consumers about a product, category, or company. Advertisements can be used to excite request for a certain category or industry, or for a definite brand, item, or firm. To establish an effective campaign, the firm desires to classify its target market, set advertising concepts, describe its product, assess and select media, produce the ad, and evaluate the ad's impact.
Answer:
- Income = $10,000
- Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) Deduction = $0
- Claim $10,000 as itemized deduction due to expenses
Explanation:
The activity being a hubby does not exempt it from tax so the $10,000 will be included as income for tax purposes and there will be no deduction for this from the AGI.
She can however, claim her expenses as itemized deductions. There is no tax on interest payment so expenses deducted are:
= 4,000 + 6,500 - 500
= $10,000
Answer:
Normative
Positive
Normative
Positive
Explanation:
Positive Economics is objective and statements are usually based on facts and economic theory. They can be tested.
For example, the statement , In some circumstances, if taxes are lowered,
government revenues actually increase, can be tested and it has it basis in economic theory
Normative economics is based value judgements, opinions and perspectives. For example, the statement - taxes are too high - is based on opinion. To some it is too high while to others it would be too low
<span>Jorge has a debt ratio 37% which means he has more money to spend for the month, Jose has debt ratio of 102% which means he has relatively less money to spend in the current month and their take home pay is same. So their current financial situation is Jorge is currently solvent where as Jose is currently insolvent. So these are the conclusion drawn from their debt ratios.</span>
