Answer: The answer is D and B
Explanation: Citizen Journalism is based upon public citizens "playing an active or important role in the process of collecting, reporting, analyzing, and circulating news and informations.
Answer:
The benefit buffet for cancer research was a big hit. The salad was <em><u>crunchy</u></em>, and the croutons were <em><u>crisp</u></em>. The punch they served was very <em><u>refreshing</u></em>. The peaches were <u>juicy</u> and messy to eat. The grapefruit, however, had an <em><u>acidic</u></em><em> </em>taste to them. The<em> </em><em><u>mouth-watering</u></em> meatballs were eaten quickly. The roast beef was very <em><u>tender</u></em>. It seemed to melt into the mouth. The milk had been sitting out too long, so it tasted <em><u>sour</u></em>. The green olives were very <em><u>bitter</u></em><em> </em>and they were also eaten quickly. The lasagna, which had been baked with aluminum foil that had melted into the food, tended to have a <em><u>metallic</u></em><em> </em>taste. Overall, the buffet was definitely an unforgettable experience.
Explanation:
The sense of taste can be described using different terms, depending on the food and the condition or quality they are produced. Moreover, the taste also depends on the preparation process and the way the customer/ consumer wants.
The different words to describe the taste of the foods in the given passage are given as below-
The benefit buffet for cancer research was a big hit. The salad was <em><u>crunchy</u></em>, and the croutons were <em><u>crisp</u></em>. The punch they served was very <em><u>refreshing</u></em>. The peaches were <u>juicy</u> and messy to eat. The grapefruit, however, had an <em><u>acidic</u></em><em> </em>taste to them. The<em> </em><em><u>mouth-watering</u></em> meatballs were eaten quickly. The roast beef was very <em><u>tender</u></em>. It seemed to melt into the mouth. The milk had been sitting out too long, so it tasted <em><u>sour</u></em>. The green olives were very <em><u>bitter</u></em><em> </em>and they were also eaten quickly. The lasagna, which had been baked with aluminum foil that had melted into the food, tended to have a <em><u>metallic</u></em><em> </em>taste. Overall, the buffet was definitely an unforgettable experience.
Answer:
I think it's precise..
Explanation:
Hope i have helped you! :)
I think the answer you are looking for might be B. Actually I don´t see how it could be D. I´m sure it´s B.
The dissenters in the flag-burning case and their supporters might at this juncture note an irony in my argument. My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of our self-conception and that commitment to it requires the rejection of official dogma. But how is that admittedly dogmatic belief different from any other dogma, such as the one inferring that freedom of expression stops at the border of the flag?
The crucial distinction is that the commitment to freedom of conscience and expression states the simplest and least self-contradictory principle that seems to capture our aspirations. Any other principle is hopelessly at odds with our commitment to freedom of conscience. The controversy surrounding the flag-burning case makes the case well.
The controversy will rage precisely because burning the flag is such a powerful form of communication. Were it not, who would care? Thus were we to embrace a prohibiton on such communication, we would be saying that the 1st Amendment protects expression only when no one is offended. That would mean that this aspect of the 1st Amendment would be of virtually no consequence. It would protect a person only when no protection was needed. Thus, we do have one official dogma-each American may think and express anything he wants. The exception is expression that involves the risk of injury to others and the destruction of someone else`s property. Neither was present in this case.
