Answer: Option A
Explanation: Determine priorities and set realistic goals
Answer:
Proposal A: 5,455 units
Proposal B: 5,770 units
Explanation:
The break-even point is the number of units required for the revenue to equal the total costs.
For proposal A:
Fixed Costs = $60,000
Variable Costs = $13 / unit
Selling Price = $24 / unit
For proposal B:
Fixed Costs = $75,000
Variable Costs = $11 / unit
Selling Price = $24 / unit
Rounding up to the next whole unit, the break-even points for proposal A and B, respectively, are 5,455 and 5,770 units.
Answer:
$3,412
Explanation:
The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
= 
= 
= 2,954 units
The carrying cost is
= $15.40 × 15%
= $2.31
The number of orders would be equal to
= Annual demand ÷ economic order quantity
= 120,000 ÷ 2,954 units
= 40.62 orders
Now The total cost of ordering cost is
Ordering cost = Number of orders × ordering cost per order
= 40.62 orders × $
84
= $3,412
Answer:
These questions are incomplete since the article relating to Hologen company is not attached. However, I would answer them this way.
Explanation:
1) A floating rate bond has a shorter duration; almost zero and it has lower sensitivity to interest rates compared to a fixed rate bond.This means that the former has a lower interest rate risk. Investors tend to demand floating rate bonds when they expect future interest rates to rise because their prices would be close to their par values as their interest rates would also increase. On the other hand, fixed bond's interest rates are inversely related to their prices.
2)
For an issuing company, borrowing money floating rates terms could be riskier for cashflow management purposes . Every time interest rates increases, it means that the company would pay higher interests to lenders which could hurt its profitability. The fluctuations could also negatively affect future financial planning unlike issuing fixed rate bonds whose coupon payments are constant hence decreasing the volatility of earnings.
In a Unified Command, members representing multiple jurisdictions and agencies work together to establish: the Internet objectives.
<u>
Explanation:</u>
When two or more persons shares the incident commander role is a Unified Command authority structure in an Incident Command System. It is a way for carrying the commanding activities by which the agencies and jurisdictions that are responding will be working altogether for the establishment of internet objectives.
When there exists incidents having many jurisdictions and agencies that this type of command is very essential. The persons sharing the authority will be working together without affecting the responsibilities and authority of the agencies individually.
